Questions & Conversations

we have a web connection where we (temporarily) receive the bearer tokens via another way (yes i know, not ideal, hence temporary) and store them in a table. i have modelled the web connection with authentication type: bearer token and the bearer token as {token}.my question is: how do i fill this with the value in the table for every tennant?

Hallo everyvone,we currently have a customer who would like to use the database in MS Fabric. We are having some difficulty setting up the Thinkwise platform.Has anyone ever got the platform to work in MS Fabric? Is this even supported?Thanks and best regards from Germany.

I did a merge from our production db to our test db, plus a restore of both iam and db itself, to have a clean slate and start over with the exact same data.Yet when I do a creation now, on the test, I get these added checks everywhere, which result in errors.They look like this:alter table "relatie"add constraint "c_relatie_opmerking" check ("opmerking" in ('0', '1', '2', '3'))goOpmerking is a varchar(5000) column, so obviously this will fail. But no one here has any idea why these get added. The live doesn’t have them. To illustrate:This is the production, with 5 constraintsthis is the test with 11I can not delete them, only add (nor would

Hello everyone,In our application on a specific screen we have a view which is not responding with data at times. When we create a project in our application, we have a screen which displays some basic data, but this data is over the entire project and over different tables. To create four columns with the right data, we use a few “union all” statements.The union all statements make sure four relatively complex queries are executed to create the following view: This view sometimes fails to show its data, these columns are created by four queries on the respective tables and four times a union all. On the role where it goes wrong, only one of these columns is allowed to be shown, so could it be something like that, why it occasionally fails to load? Or is it because sometimes the query is too much for Indicium in combin

Hi!I’ve successfully run the full upcycler on the AdventureWorks model from the e-learning. I’m now exploring the (AI) model enrichments.I was able to execute the ‘Add a table description with AI’ enrichment without any issues. However, when I try to run ‘Translate all untranslated objects’, I don’t get any results under ‘Potential model updates’. The message indicates that no potential updates were found.Here’s what I’ve checked and prepared so far: I’m using the GPT-5 model, and there’s sufficient budget available to process the requests. I want the translations to be in Dutch, and I’ve entered this in the ‘Filter the language for which translations must be generated’ field. The API key is correct. The first enrichment wouldn’t have worked otherwise. There are 2386 untranslated objects in total. Do you have any idea what might be causing this, or is

All,From our thinkwise application we send email via SQl msdb. This works fine for years, but now I deployed a test application and emails with an attachment will not be sent. It’s a rights issue, the attachment is on another share, so not on the SQL server. If I start the application via the SF it works fine. If I start the application via IAM (not via Indicium so in the ini file RDBMS = SQLSERVER)an email without attachment is sent, an email with an attachment will not be sent.I added logging in my send mail script.EXEC xp_fileexist @FilePath;Die geeft 0 terug, wat betekent dat de Thinkwise app de bijlage NIET ziet.De SQL USER function heb ik ook in de logging gezet en die geeft terug: [domain]\srv_indiciumThe SUSER_NAME() is diezelfde gebruiker.En de ORIGINAL_LOGIN() is mijn eigen account.Zowel mijn eigen account als de srv_indicium hebben rechten op de share waar de bestanden staan.Als ik in de verkenner he

We have several tables where an image upload is possible. For end users it feels awkward that they first have to add a row, then push a "button” to actually have the GUI open the camera (or gallery) to actualy fill the field. Is there a way to have the GUI automatically open the camera (or gallery) to actually take a picture into the application?We are currently on version 2025.2 of the platform. I havent found a flow automation step that could handle this an automate what I want. 

How to attack this issue with Web Connector? We have in our private cloud a reporting solution and this one as an API I can invoke. This one has been placed behind a reverse proxy with a local domain report.app.lef. Now I get this error (indicium 2025.3).  I'm assuming this is due to the fact that it's signed with out own Root CA? If so, how do I make Indicium trust our CA? System.Net.Http.HttpRequestException: The SSL connection could not be established, see inner exception. ---> System.Security.Authentication.AuthenticationException: The remote certificate is invalid because of errors in the certificate chain: PartialChain at System.Net.Security.SslStream.SendAuthResetSignal(ReadOnlySpan`1 alert, ExceptionDispatchInfo exception) at System.Net.Security.SslStream.CompleteHandshake(SslAuthenticationOptions sslAuthenticationOptions) at System.Net.Security.SslStream.ForceAuthenticationAsync[TIOAdapter](Boolean receiveFirst, Byte[]

Anyone knows why Edge is using 30-35% of processor capacity when starting a TW Universal application in the browser? Is this normal?

When you are on a grid that is filterable and you filter a column that consists of domain elements, the selection popup shows the user the database values of the domain elements. It should show them the translation of the elements instead. 

Hi all, I’m using the web connection process action to interact with a third party API. There are two issues I run into:“Path” is a fixed property, requiring me to define many endpoints for the web connection; “Method” is a fixed property for the endpoint, but not part of the key for that record. It does not allow multiple methods per endpoint.For the path there are two ways I tried to work around this: defining “Path” as {path} in order to turn it into a parameter defining `url_path` as a parameter to the web connection.The method is a domain with elements in the endpoint definition, not allowing to enter {method} as “Method”. I did define `http_request_method` as parameter to the web connection. I was not able to get either option to work as I intended. Does the web connection process action support this kind of abstraction? Should I model this as a custom / message protocol independent

In universal when a screen or connection takes a long time to load the data you first get a no results message in the grid. This is kind of confusing since it’s still loading the data. The message in the grid suggest there is nothing to show however the loading icon is still doing its thing. After a while the data shows. Can we replace the no result message with a: loading data, spinner icon or whichever makes sense.    

We are almost completely rid of the use of the old WIndows and Web GUI's, and users are more or less getting convenient with the Universal GUI's look and feel. But we are missing some functionality when it comes to Startobjects that users could define in the WIndows (or Web) GUI. When a users switched from the old to the new GUI, the startobjects are there (like menu items with tables that are by default opened). The sorting is not clear and different compared to the old gui's, but at least the open. But when we reset, for whatever reason, the user's preferences, there is no way to re-create the, for instance, startobjects, for that user. I haven't found the functionality in Universal yet to do this. So the user needes to go back to the Windows or Web GUI to reconfigure his or hers startobject(s), to get them working again in Universal.Any idea if this functionalitity exists in Universal, and if not when we can expect it there?

I don’t understand the drag and drop interface.I have a table “ams_location_object” and both a list and a tree view, in both the same happens.I select and item A, and I go to the side bar, drag another item B, onto an item C.I would expect that I get task parameters from B and C (I don’t know which one should be the task parameters and which one the drag drop parameters, that is the second question), but I do get task parameters for B and A. I don’t get anything from C.Trying it with an other setting I found that the task is from the target.So; task parameter = drop target, drag drop parameter = drag source.But I somehow don’t get the item I dropped on, but the selected item as parameter. That is only useful if you drop on the table, not on a row. It should work as you can reorder items in the software factory. Here I want to assign the parent on drop, so that reorganizing the tree view can be done without

Hi all,In several applications within our environment, we use File link-domains in the Windows GUI to open files stored on a shared network drive. For example DWG drawings, but also PDFs: Drawings that open in AutoCAD / DWG True ViewIn the Universal GUI this does not work in the same way, because the GUI always downloads the file instead of opening it directly in the default application for the specific file type.As we move from the Windows GUI to the Universal GUI, I am curious to learn what other customers have done to address this.

Since the next platform release will support the SF on the Universal GUI, I was wondering if we could get some info/screenshots on the progress. What concessions or limitations in comparison with the Windows GUI SF will be made? Will it still be possible to edit template code in SMSS for example? It would be cool if a demo SF (beta version) could be published like https://insights.thinkwise.app/ so the community can play around and maybe notice any shortcomings before the actual release.

Hi,I am running into an issue with going to the universal login page. Normally, when proceding to the weblink of universal (acc/prod) I get the following page. Continuing results in the following webpage: However, some users deleted the cookies for the universal webpage. Normally, this wasn't a problem. Simply refreshing the page results into the pages above and the user can login. But this time the users get the following screen: Since these users need to login via the SSO, this page doesn't work for them. The curious thing is tha

In de U-GUI the data does not show a thousand separator for the integer value, as we have not used a numeric control for that column.U-GUI value Domain setting of specific columnWhen the data is exported to Excel it however does have the thousand separator set for the cell.Excel export valueAs this value is also used for external purposes by our users, it becomes quite a burden that they have to change the value as that dot (in my case) also ends up in their other

Is there a reason the dots on grid header for filtering are on different locations?  

Hallo,Would like to check, how to add a new user group to a user in IAM? I have a process flow to add a new user group to a user but the store procedure I'm calling seems wrong. Below is the sample of adding user group in user manually: For auto created user group I use the task_copy_usr_grp store procedure in my endpoint url on web connector process action.  Path: /indicium/iam/iam/usr_grp_usr(tenant_id=1,usr_grp_id='{to_copy_user_name_2}')/task_copy_usr_grp But not sure if the store procedure is correct a

in our proces flow we use a taask to fill a column which is used as the body of an email that is then send via the email connector.proces flow monitor is all ok, until the actual sending of the email, then the time-out occurs.credentials are checked and ok, smtp server is functioning. any tips on what could be causing this issue?

We have an editable grid and we need to enter some numbers on different records.After saving a line the grid looses focus related to the up and down keys.We have to select the line again with the mouse before we can move to the next line with the down arrow key. If we use the down arrow key directly after saving, the grid is scrolling, instead of moving the highlighted (=selected) line to the next record. 

The thinkwise documentation states that the end date of a user in the IAM controls the access of a user to the application. However, the user is still able to access the application after i fill in the end date. If i fill in the end dates in the user group of which the user is a member of then the user has no access to the application. I expected the end date on user level would be the primary end date. Am i mistaken about what the end date of a user does? We are using windows GUI and version 2025.1. The user is not an admin or have any other role in the IAM and authentication is through windows.

Hello everyone,As the title suggests I have the that error on indexes:I did see a post where a validation is supposed to be in place to prevent this from happening. But does that also count for when you create a unique constraint on multiple primary keys? Because I cannot find the validation and now I cannot (re)build my database anymore. I would need to fix this first, but in the newest validations by Thinkwise, a validation on this table would pop up urging it needs a unique constraint on the two primary keys used in the constraint. So what can I do to fix this? Did anybody else experience this problem?