Questions & Conversations

Hi tried to update Indicium this morning but Indicium will not start anymore.I have unblocked the block flag of all files with the streams.exe tool. I copied all new files to the indicium location and updated the appsettings.json. That's the normal procedure. But when opening the Indicium URL I'm getting this error. The windows event log gives the same message. The application will not start... TTP Error 502.5 - ANCM Out-Of-Process Startup FailureCommon causes of this issue:The application process failed to start The application process started but then stopped The application process started but failed to listen on the configured portTroubleshooting steps:Check the system event log for error messages Enable logging the application process' stdout messages Attach a debugger to the application process and inspectFor more information visit: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=808681  

I'm testing the upgrade from SF 2021.1 to SF 2021.2 and I noticed something in the unit tests, there's an assertion message thrown:Failed: The logic managed to rollback the unit test transaction. Please remove the random rollback statement. I've discovered that this is caused by the tasks’ “atomic transaction” feature. For example I have a task with a dbo.tsf_send_message ‘some_error’, null, 1 which will call raiserror(), that will cause the task transaction to rollback. But as a side effect the unit test no longer succeeds where it would in previous versions. How can this be fixed? I also did notice that there is a new “Is empty” assert. Which is nice, but why isn't it converted by default? I've performed this script to correct it:update t set t.unit_test_condition = 10 -- Is emptyfrom unit_test_output_parmtr_overview twhere t.project_id = @project_id and t.project_vrs_id = @project_vrs_id and t.expected_output_value is null and t.unit_test_condition = 0 -- Is equal to 

Hi, with the update of IAM 2021.2 tenants are introduced. We’ve already had some kind of custom tenant structure (outside IAM) and I would like to apply the tenant structure as well into IAM. It might be interesting for us, so the external tooling could disappear.However, I want to upgrade to 2021.2 including a proper tenant structure, unfortunately there is no task to move a user and user groups to it's own (new) tenant, it's all to “Default”. Is this somehow possible?

In Universal GUI i cannot edit Dates while Editing in Grid. Is that a bug or do i have a wrong setting? 

Hi, How can I overcome the error 500 when the following request is made: DELETE https://twisodev01.acto.nl/indicium/iam/5414/someview(id=576001) it gives a nice dialog in the screen that an error occurred due to this:delete instead of trigger on the view executes a delete on the realtablethe delete trigger on the realtable has some condition:    if exists (               select 1               from   deleted d               where  d.is_locked = 1              )    begin      exec dbo.tsf_send_message 'deletion_error', null, 1      rollback tran      return    end Now the magic starts:It returns a 500 error on the request, which is a server error (is it?),it registers an error in the indicium log (is it really?)and the debugger in the windows gui shows a System.Net.WebException(why?). What is the proper way to let indicium handle such a delete action where a trigger prohibits the delete and sends back the message to the user it cannot delete the record due to some constraints - in a way

Hi All,Is it possible to turn off (e.g. ctx proc) for when Multiple Records are selected?I have an invoice overview, and the user can reset the invoice. But I want this to be done per grid row. When I select multiple records, the task is still selectable. Can I turn off a task when more records are selected? Feels like a very simple thing, but somehow I don’t see it. Thnx! 

I have a parameter screen (for a task). In this screen the items are displayed next to each other. Is there a possibility via Subjects (or another way) to set options for displaying the items? And is it possible within Universal also?

Is there any functionality already available related to this I did not get any reply yet to this idea.

Is it possible to export a particular project or a project version? In order to be able to import it again when necessary.

With the latest version of the Universal GUI the checkbox “Remember me” is added. When tabbing through the fields from password to remember me, I expected it would go to remember me, but it didn't, it went to the “Eye” from “Show password”.If you hit spacebar immediately, your password is shown. We've discussed this internally and think this is not appropriate. Lets say I was lucky that there was no colleague standing next to me or I was sharing a screen .Maybe should the “Eye” be excluded from the tab stops?Other applications I've seen you can only use the ‘click’ to show te password (e.g. Windows login) or have an explicit link / button that is more clear that it is a button / part of the tab sequence. I didn't expect the eye to be part of the tab sequence, because it's inside the password box.  

Is it possible to set up conditional formatting for form only? I like to keep my grid clean, but would like to make some fields (e/g date) when certain things are (not) set. Any thoughts on this? 

Hi all,I have two tables; purchase_header and purchase_line.  This is all ok, but I keep running (also with other situations, this is just an example). When I select this Purchase_header line (displayed as 2), and i got to the Cost Lines tab (table Purchase_line).  In this purchase_line screen I need to use the purchase_header_id (the 2 in this case). Can I access this data? Because it is super needed! I have a feeling this can be accessed; yet I can’t find it. I would be very happy is this can be used. Anyone out there that can shine a light in my dark world? Alex 

If you are using a Windows GUI, which is connected to the database using the Indicium Basic, to use any form of single sign on?Currently I have set this up for a client of mine. They will have to insert their username or email address and password. But their Windows Credentials match their account in IAM. So you would kind of expect that the Authentication option MSWINDOWS would be available when using the Indicium Basic as your server. Is there any way to set this up?

Hello there,I’ve been searching through the documentation to find how exactly is determined which process action step is taken in a process flow.A new feature requires me to accurately predict (in a process) which process action is next in the flow. This would be easy if there is only one route to follow but when there are multiple, I need to check the values of the process step parameters.Let’s say there are three routes in a process flow originating from a decision node. To determine which route will be taken we can check variables @thisStep_nextOne, @thisStep_nextTwo, @thisStep_stop.This is how I thought it worked:All routes set to 0 or lower are ignored The route with the lowest number above 0 is selected In case of a tie, the route with the lowest order_no is selectedThis is giving me wrong results so I must be getting these logic rules wrong. Can anyone tell me how exactly this works?

With every new to add item our field BookingNr is auto set by for example Last high BookingNr + 1.This works fine when using the Add button (Ctrl ++), however, this does not work for the Copy button (Ctrl + Alt ++).A very tedious workaround could be to create a ‘copy’ task which copies all fields from an existing row, except for the one we wish to set separately, but this is far from ideal. Furthermore, we can refer to ‘Add new’ by verifying with@import_modebut this only separates ‘Add new’ from ‘Update’ - of course Copy would be same as Add new. I would like to know if there is a quick and simple way to do what we need without above mentioned workaround?Please advise. Thank you,Paul

Hi all,in the web gui, is it possible to double click a grid row, and then show a form with details from a lookup?I have a feel this can be done, but so far I do not get any results. Would be great to get a hint!Thnx! Alex      

For a client we're currently scoping the development of a new integration to their system.This platform offers data exchange services between multiple parties. Their service is API based with the actual message traffic being send in XML. Because of the type of data being processed security is extremely important to all parties involved.It is therefor mandatory to sign all outgoing messages. Their documentation contains the following example on how to do this within the context op postman.openssl dgst -sha256 -sign ‘[private_key_name].key’ -out ‘[signature_name].sha256’ ‘[message_name].xml’If then asks you to base64 encode the signature_name.sha256 and message_name.xml before transmission.How would we approach this from within a Thinkwise environment?

Hi,I have a filter form with a date field. Is this date available for me to do some calculations with? So in this case I want to have 5/1/2021, so that I can use this to calculate the amount of days before the date of the search. Is this possible?  Thanks! Alex      

I’m trying to setup a connection between my application and the simple notification service (SNS) from AWS. This is proving to be troublesome because of the way AWS manages these subscriptions.To subscribe AWS first sends a subscription token to the endpoint (in indicium)  that will receive the SNS notifications. The endpoint in my application then needs to reply with the SNS-token to verify the subscription.To send the subscription token, AWS sends two messages: One without authentication and then one with authentication based on the header that is received in response of the first message.The endpoint in my application needs to respond to the first message without authentication with a 401 code with a header that specifies the type of authentication that is expected*: WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm=“<application>” .Indicium automatically responds with a 401 code and the header:WWW-Authenticate: Indicium realm=“<application>” Even when using a message protocol-independent w

Is it possible to create a sequence from the sf?

I am still looking for a method to schedule stored procedures in a process flow and expected this in the 2021.2 release.There doesn't seem to be any process action for this yet. But, could it be realized by using a 'dummy' HTTP connector (eg GET: www.nos.nl) or by using a Decision?   … and then calling the desired stored procedure within the process procedure, like below:create procedure prc_pf_send_notifications_pf_execute_stored_procedure( @dummy text_100 output)asbegin -- Do not count affected rows for performance SET NOCOUNT ON; --control_proc_id: process_pf_send_notifications --template_id: process_pf_send_notifications --prog_object_item_id: process_pf_send_notifications --template_description: EXEC dbo.any_stored_procedureendgo Or is there a more elegant way? Related post: 

We have our databases in Simple recovery model. Is it a problem for using an application in Thinkwise or the SF to have it in Full recovery model?

Is the the current version of the Window GUI (+2021.2.10) able to connect and fully compatible with Indicium for Universal?

Hello,Currently, when i create a badge control procedure, the checkbox ‘Badge’ under Performance on the subject is automatically checked, but the checkbox ‘Show badge’ on the main subject is not automatically checked. Is there a reason why this is the default action? Wouldn’t it make much more sence to just automatically check the ‘Show badge’ box as well?

I have very straight forward process flow:  Based on a value of a task parameter, I would like to skip sending the email (via the SMTP connector). I know it is possible to do this with code, but I can't find where to do so. Can someone please explain me in a few steps how I can acomplish this?