Propose your fantastic ideas regarding the Thinkwise Platform to our Product Team.
A feature which would be a great help to me is an option to switch between lookup/element values and database values. Obviously you would like to see the lookup column and translated elements within a screen. However sometimes, for debugging, you would like to switch to seeing the database values instead. This will allow you to quickly determine the ID's for all lookup columns and see the database value for the domain elements. You can use these values for further debugging using SQL scripts.You could implement this option in the developers tab in the ribbon.
I would like to be able to show progress messages in a process flow. For example, when I use a multirow task, it is not possible to show progress (see, How can I show progress in the execution of a multirow task? | Thinkwise Community (thinkwisesoftware.com))
Hi Community, I would like to disable or hide prefilters in universal based on a context or layout procedure. Similar to the question in this topic.
Hi,When you put a filter on a list column, you get a neat little icon next to the column heading to show you that it’s filtered. But when you grouplist the column(s) there is no indicator that it’s filtered:Is it possible to show a filtered indication when a list is grouped with filters?rgds Ricky
I would like to see some improvements in the the process schedule:Frequency to be fetched from tenant or user (expression), now it's a fixed value while in multi-tenant/multi-user environments could happen that you have a asynchronous system flow, where in our case a user can define how often a time info will be updated. When recurring, can starting at/to be not mandatory.. if empty then it's the whole day. I keep forgetting that 00 to 00 means not running. (separate idea)
Inspired by this idea: Automatically assigning validation to the user that created or mutated the related object. In most of the cases that would make sense.
Code review being mandatory is a global SF setting right now.sf_configFor some models, you don’t want to mandatory code review. For instance if you have a model where only one developer works on.Alternatively, make an overwrite setting per model/branch that overrules the default setting in sf_config.
When creating a control procedure, it is useful to have an overview of all parameters within the template. I usually go through the following steps: Create a object (Task, Subroutine, Function etc..) with parameters Create a Control Procedure and Assign the ‘New’ template to the object Generate the definiton, copy-paste all parameters to the template and add following the text at the end of each parameter: ‘-- [empty_line_on_generate]’ Code: -- PARAMETERS FOR DEVELOPMENT -- [empty_line_on_generate] DECLARE @id AS id -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_01 AS text_10 -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_02 AS text_1000 -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_03 AS date_no_time -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_04 AS int -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_05 AS amount -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_06 AS amount -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_07 AS percentage -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_09 AS country_id -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_10 AS text_255 -- [empty_line_on_generate] Generate the parameters, empty the value and switch the ‘no_line_when_empty’ option to ON As a result, you always have access to all parameters, which you can give a value to test the code during development. Like this: -- PARAMETERS FOR DEVELOPMENT -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @id AS id = '1234' -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_01 AS text_10 = 'ABC' -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_02 AS text_1000 = 'ZZZ' -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_03 AS date_no_time = NULL -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_04 AS int = NULL -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_05 AS amount = NULL -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_06 AS amount = NULL -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_07 AS percentage = NULL -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_09 AS country_id = 'NL' -- [empty_line_on_generate]DECLARE @parameter_10 AS text_255 = 'XXXX' -- [empty_line_on_generate]INSERT INTO .... ETC.. And you will not have errors when executing the code. Idea for improvement in SF: Add some code to the ‘Assign’ button to automate step 3 and 4
As there are a few bigger online workspace providers out there it would be great if Thinkwise would support these out of the box. Primarily we are missing OneDrive support for companies that use Microsoft 365 and Google Drive support for companies that use Google Workspace.
Hi!I recently found out that the combination of a BIT datatype and an Image combo does not work.It does work with the different int data types, but not as BIT.I thought it would be a good little addition! Current situation
With regards to a previous topic, Code review items per template | Thinkwise Community (thinkwisesoftware.com), I would like to repost this idea.The desire to have a review per template still is present. The comment suggest that it is an improvement to be able to comment the code per template, but that always has been possible with a little bit of effort by simply naming the template before you mention your comments. The real issue is that you are not able to approve or reject a single template, but you always have to reject the whole control procedure. I really would like to see a finer solution to reviewing items in the software factory. In addition to templates we would also like to be able to review expression fields, prefilters and also unit tests.
This idea is created from this question.Currently in the IAM you are able to set the following on user-level:https://docs.thinkwisesoftware.com/docs/iam/users#configure-user-preferences Select a Configuration or create a new configuration using the pop-up. Available configurations are: None - No user preferences are stored and the user preferences ribbon is hidden. Resize - Users can collapse and expand their menu and ribbon. Furthermore, they can change the sort sequence and column width in a grid view. Move - Resize plus the option to configure their own start objects and set the sort sequence of all subjects. OnOff - All options except for changing screen types. Complete - All user preferences options are available to the user. The idea consists of 2 parts:No more ‘grouped’ options. Get more control over the separate features you want the user the be able to access. For example: - Change screentype yes/no - Toggle Details yes/no - User defined prefilters yes/no - List yes/no etc. Be able to set these settings on a group-level too instead of just user-level, where the leading configuration is derived from all configurations combined (like with role access).
We would like some functionality in Universal which makes it possible for a user to hide columns/groups of columns in their view.Are there any plans for implementing such functionality and if not, is this a possibility?
When adding new functionality and you skip the tab "Templates", by default a (New) template will be added with content:INSERT CODE HERE I feel it is better to put double hyphens before this autogenerated script to make it as a comment. Currently it will generate incorrect code and is reason for aborting the code execution to the DTAP environments.
For our projects we use a lot of tasks that are simultaniously displayed on the user's screen.To clean up our application we would like to use a contextmenu in the Universal GUI, like the contextmenu in the Windows GUI.We would like the addition of a contextmenu in the Universal GUI, to make tasks available in the contextmenu so we can clean up the rest of the application, and to use the extra functionality that comes with the contextmenu.
As a developer, I would like to orientate bars such as the Task and Report bars vertically --Made by moderator
Allowing the action bar (and by extension, the search, because that's included in the action bar) to be modeled vertically. See: action bar vertical | Thinkwise Community (thinkwisesoftware.com)
See screenshots and title, a very simple rename where you want to remove a capital letter in the SF.This is very small but annoying bug since this might happen when you accidentally start with a capital letter.You now have to either delete the table and create a new one, or rename it to something different and then rename it back to the original name without the capital letter.
In Data model one can make a design and if you then go to tables one see all tables. You can use a filter but I would like an option to see in tables only the tables that are selected in Design.
Dear all,It would be nice to have a search to filter the set of tables or views on the above mentioned screen, same goes for the references. I want to filter specific tables based on my filter string.
I would like the Software Factory to automatically change the fields status and developer when someone makes any adjustment to the templates of this control procedure (or changes the code the the control procedure). Currently when a control procedure is submitted for review a user can still make changes to it and it's templates. If you do so, the Software Factory will create a changelog comment. I do not find this suitable.If someone makes a change to it, the control procedure should be set to status development and the developer should be set to the one that made the last change. It should not create such a changelog comment line.If this is to complex, then lock a control procedure when it is set for review. This means that the developer will have to manually set it to the status development (also set the developer column to the person that is executing the task to set it to development).This will be of great help in the process of making changes to templates combined with reviewing them.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.