Propose your fantastic ideas regarding the Thinkwise Platform to our Product Team.
Can a ‘Refresh Model’ function be added to the Universal GUI?During development, when Universal is running over SF, it cost a lot of time to log-off an log-on every time.
For applications where the user isn't always looking at the screen for visual confirmation it would be nice to have a way for them to be alerted to what's happening there. For instance, when user hand scanners in the Windows GUI I have no way to alert the user that their scan has failed except for interrupting the whole process to show them a blocking message.It would be great if I could use a (hidden) message to inform then of (un)succesful actions, where the message would play a sound from a file that's designated in the message.
As per discussion in: Mark has suggested that we open an idea for having the logged in application alias available in the session context similar to the application language already implemented in Indicium 2021.1.18.Please vote.
It is possible to add tasks and reports to the tiles menu. Unfortunately it is not possible to show tasks and reports in the detail tiles. Maybe a screen component property could be used to be able to enable/disable tasks and reports.
When setting the resource scheduler at “Days” I have an overview of the weeknumbers with dates. But when horizontal scrolling our Users loose the overview of the Month. IDEA: Insert name of Month within the week column. When 2 months within the same week you can show them both: like: “2022 - 17 (apr - may)”
Hi, Currently the Universal Scheduler can only display per day or week. It would be great if there was an extra zoom level. I want to set tasks for a day. So, a morning task, and an afternoon task for instance. In the currently layout, this will just be stacked per day; 2 jobs on the 5th.However, I want something like: Outlook sample - Can this be considered?
We use the Resource Scheduler in the Universal GUI to plan our Vessel fleet. For Operational purposes we need to be able to plan and display multiple Activities within a Day. Therefore we need an Hour-level timescale and the Resource Scheduler to place Activities after each other when Activity 1 datetime end is before Activity 2 datetime start. Currently they are stacked when the Day matches, even if the Time is not overlapping.Can this functionality be added to the Resource Scheduler please?This doesn't work for us
In current version of TSF it is seems not to be possible to synchronize from TSF to IAM when the target DB credentials differ from the TSF Webservice credentials.Because of this, in case the credentials cannot be made equal creating a deployment package seems to be the only way to sync IAM, which is not desirable, because this is to much complicated. Especially in case of a making small changes, like a little adjustment in a roles, this cost to much time.I would expect a possibility to enter credentials before starting the sync process or save the credentials (securely) in the IAM Configuration. Or, have I missed something and is there already an easier way?
Currently the ‘Code reviews’ screen shows code reviews per control procedure. Templates within a control procedure can be changed by different developers. We would like to see every control procedure template as an individual code review item. This would allow a reviewer to approve or disapprove a single template. This will also allow you to see at a glance which templates must be reviewed without having to look in the tabpage 'Changes’.
From the screen ‘Code reviews’ it’s possible to approve and disapprove control procedures. When we accidentally set a control procedure ‘Approved’ there’s no way to undo it because the ‘Approve’ and ‘Disapprove’ tasks are disabled. It would be a nice feature to be able to ‘Disapprove’ an already approved control procedure.
However the source code generation step has never failed me, I sometimes wonder if it is doing something. I’d like to have a more verbose output of what it is actually doing and at what step the generation process is.Currently we only see this and just have to wait:It would be nice if we are able to see the smaller steps that are happening inside a specific step. The advantage is two-fold. It keeps you up to date and makes it visible if there are any steps that are running slowly.
By setting a different background color for templates that are in a certain state it will make it easier to focus only on those templates that need it.For instance think about templates that need some fixing, have or haven't changed since last review, have been reviewed and wait response of developer, alongside prefilters to make you focus on one or the other.This not only within the Review code section, but also within the Functionality (Control procedure and templates).
Importing/adding translations and validating translations are tasks that are sometimes attributed to specific persons in the project team that are not developers. This is especially likely to happen when a high number of languages and/or more exotic languages are to be supported.To better support this scenario a formalized translator user group (and underlying roles) in the Software Factory would be beneficial. Users that are part of such a group should have access to the “Translations” menu item and the tasks to generate and translate translation objects and the possibility to import/export translations without having the possibility to change the data-/gui model and functionality.
Unit tests are great way to test API's however, our API's have the declared parameter @error_msg. Because this is the same parameter as declared in the unit test code all of our API's get the same failed message for their unit test: This is probably a more common problem, because @error_msg is a widely used parameter. Can this parameter be changed to a more uncommon one, specific for unit testing probably?
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.