Propose your fantastic ideas regarding the Thinkwise Platform to our Product Team.
Hi, please add the subflow functionality to the Windows GUI. As Universal is not an option in the near future for some, it would make the development of reusable ‘blocks’ much easier.And it will make Thinkwise a more sustainable solution with little means, win win 😀
For big models and applications, the openapi and metadata result is enormous and more often leeds to crashing client applications who want to read it. Would be great to be able to extract definitions for a specific endpoint or other sub-select. https://docs.thinkwisesoftware.com/docs/indicium/api#metadata
The Software Factory allows you to uncheck the integrity on FK references between tables. This option should be used with caution. Because on most occasions you would like to check the data integrity. Therefor it would be very useful to force developers to put in a reason why they have unchecked this integrity.Having this forces them to think about their reasons and might help them understand that unchecking this is unusual and requires specific reasons. This obviously only applies for references between tables not between tables/views.I would like to description field to be placed in this popup window
The latest Indicium release includes a nice feature to more centrally monitor the Login events on the Thinkwise platform. Currently this works with Azure Application Insights, but since we're on AWS it would be great to have this supported with AWS CloudWatch too!Could this please be added?
At the moment, expired users are treated the same as non-existing users. IAM User with an end date added in IAM ‘Ends on’ field get an 'Incorrect username or password' error on both Indicium and Universal Login page, but username and password are actually correct. Could you differentiate between users that don't exist and expired users and return a more descriptive and correct error?
Hi, I have been wondering for some time now regarding Tasks, we have a case where we need to clear all the fields in a task using default procedure but don't have any control to represent it properly. So, for now we used a checkbox to clear fields. Will it be possible in the future to allow other types of controls like buttons inside tasks or other objects (buttons in grids!) in the future? and can we bind logic to them?Maybe we can have extra property to task to have a button by default used to clear fields preprogrammed.Button Instead?
My client has a form with several fields that use a combo look-up control, this is filtered to only show limited number of rows. On a mobile device they are always presented with the on-screen keyboard, even though they never type the values for these fields, the keyboard eats up screen real estate while being unused.It would be great to be able to make the field behave like a domain with elements would with the look-up settings.
With version 2023.2, the process action Print file (PDF) has been expanded with a large number of parameters. One of these parameters is the printer tray.We want to use this new functionality to send output to different printers, including different trays.With our current production system we still use the reporting service. In addition to the desired printer, we can also specify the desired printer tray (name!).We want to convert our current production system to use Print file (PDF) and use this functionality in a new application that we are currently building. It would therefore be very desirable if we could provide the name of the printer tray, just as it is now possible with the reporting service.
Hello CommunityThis idea might have slight overlap with this idea:In addition to that idea (changing the operator/filter condition) i would also like the ability to determine if the filter is build with OR/AND between my conditions now if i use a filter they will always have an AND between them. E.G i have 2 columns in my filter process action set to Input settingsThe resulting query will be Where person_from_id = 1 AND person_to_id = 1I would like to be able to generate this queryWhere person_from_id = 1 OR person_to_id = 1I dont exactly know how this needs to be presented/implemented in the GUI maybe something like this?Train conditions from factorio
When changing the application in IAM the existing tabs, which were opened by the user, will stay open. It would be nice if this could be changed and that when someone changes from one application to another application, the existing tabs were closed. Not as a default but as an option using extended properties.
Dear all,As per current documentation the In-memory OLTP functionality in SF supports regular on Premise SQL server. Since many of us are going to cloud hosted SQL server we need to have this option enabled for cloud as well.Personally my projects are on Azure SQL and have researched only for the specific one. Other might use AWS, Google etc. Requesting that this option is enabled and during Creation process to recognize if In-Memory is Supported by the DB and accordinlgy set the correct options on the tables script creation or upgrade script.Example:On my Dev I have a lower Pricing Tier with no OLTP support. I should be able to run create and my In-Memory configured tables should be created as normal.On my Acceptance (UAT) which is production like my Pricing Tier is higher with the support of OLTP so when connecting during creation to build my code for a deployment it should detect that this is supported and my tables should be created with related option for in-memory use.ThanksMike
If you want to build an application in traditional layers, there are things you don’t want to show as a form, some things only as lookup, for filters, etc.It would be great to be able to define that something is not for user input, and hide it from the subject list.
For the listbar- and tile menu in the Universal GUI, data-testid's are added on the html-elements for the buttons. These data-testid's are missing on the html-elements for the buttons in the treeview menu. Only the html-elements for the icon and the label contain a data-testidA data-testid on the html-element of the button would really help for styling and testing purposes
We increasingly encourage to register the test scenarios they have in the SF under Manual Test Scenarios. Key users should also be able to do this. Both the registration of these scenarios and the execution of a test run. This also includes creating findings. There is actually no role for this yet. A test role. A role that only makes these test functionalities available. The situation is such that we have indicated that we will register the test scenarios in the SF. These are currently in an Excel file.Later, if Key-users are going to perform regression tests, for example, it would be appropriate if they could do this via the SF. Then all these test runs are registered. The wish is therefore to create a test role that can at least be used for the following components:Specification -> Manual Test Scenarios Quality -> Manual Tests
When creating a table column that has a calculation type, it is necessary to write some code. Based on the type, the structure of the code will be different from one and other. Such like Expression columns, you can make use of the “T1.” alias, which is the table itself, whilst Calculated columns cannot use this.Just like the code example in Control procedure for SQL-typed CP's, I would like a short example that shows me as a developer what I can (and cannot) use as code. Example: Expression: concat_ws(' ', t1.first_name, t1.last_name) --Thanks @Robbert :) Calculated: (100.0 + tax_percentage) / 100.0 Calculated (function): select sum(order_total) from sales_order where sales_order_id = @sales_order_id
Currently the Subname object is placed within the Quality → Validation section. This is not preferred. There should a direct menu item for the subnames in the Software Factory. Probably under the menu group Data.
Reason behind the below request is that currently, our soon to be published application will need to server approximately 6k users. Managing mass notifications through scripts and other non-automated actions is not efficient and can easily make mistakes.We are in need of an email functionality within the IAM to communicate with the users.What this functionality needs to do is being able to store specified email templates by the IAM administrator. Be able to set automated emails based on specified template to be send out related to Actions done within the IAM from a user as alerts. User Activation & de-activation. User management related emails ( registration, unregister, account deletion, etc... ) Sending informative and Notification emails (System Maintenance, Downtime, Planned upgrades) Have it linked to the Universal GUI under the Account Menu, for user System notifications within the published apps. The IAM sits on top of Indicium and the SMTP configuration can be used to send out the emails. Please let me know what you think and if there is already the same idea posted share it to be voted.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.