Thinkwise Platform

In the Web GUI when you choose “Export immediately”, it only exports the visible columns. When I use this same option in the Universal GUI, it uses all columns of the table/view.How can I enable the same functionality, as we do not want users to see the hidden data?

Hi all, I’m using the web connection process action to interact with a third party API. There are two issues I run into:“Path” is a fixed property, requiring me to define many endpoints for the web connection; “Method” is a fixed property for the endpoint, but not part of the key for that record. It does not allow multiple methods per endpoint.For the path there are two ways I tried to work around this: defining “Path” as {path} in order to turn it into a parameter defining `url_path` as a parameter to the web connection.The method is a domain with elements in the endpoint definition, not allowing to enter {method} as “Method”. I did define `http_request_method` as parameter to the web connection. I was not able to get either option to work as I intended. Does the web connection process action support this kind of abstraction? Should I model this as a custom / message protocol independent

Hi A couple of weeks ago I implemented the following topic to work in my on premise application. When I tested the drag and drop functionality myself, everything worked fine. This week however, the tester ran into an unauthorized error. After some testing myself I found something weird.When I log into my application via: https://my-appl/universal and I try to upload a file I get the following error:However, when I log in via https://my-appl/indicium and then navigate to 

Since the next platform release will support the SF on the Universal GUI, I was wondering if we could get some info/screenshots on the progress. What concessions or limitations in comparison with the Windows GUI SF will be made? Will it still be possible to edit template code in SMSS for example? It would be cool if a demo SF (beta version) could be published like https://insights.thinkwise.app/ so the community can play around and maybe notice any shortcomings before the actual release.

How to attack this issue with Web Connector? We have in our private cloud a reporting solution and this one as an API I can invoke. This one has been placed behind a reverse proxy with a local domain report.app.lef. Now I get this error (indicium 2025.3).  I'm assuming this is due to the fact that it's signed with out own Root CA? If so, how do I make Indicium trust our CA? System.Net.Http.HttpRequestException: The SSL connection could not be established, see inner exception. ---> System.Security.Authentication.AuthenticationException: The remote certificate is invalid because of errors in the certificate chain: PartialChain at System.Net.Security.SslStream.SendAuthResetSignal(ReadOnlySpan`1 alert, ExceptionDispatchInfo exception) at System.Net.Security.SslStream.CompleteHandshake(SslAuthenticationOptions sslAuthenticationOptions) at System.Net.Security.SslStream.ForceAuthenticationAsync[TIOAdapter](Boolean receiveFirst, Byte[]

Anyone knows why Edge is using 30-35% of processor capacity when starting a TW Universal application in the browser? Is this normal?

I did a merge from our production db to our test db, plus a restore of both iam and db itself, to have a clean slate and start over with the exact same data.Yet when I do a creation now, on the test, I get these added checks everywhere, which result in errors.They look like this:alter table "relatie"add constraint "c_relatie_opmerking" check ("opmerking" in ('0', '1', '2', '3'))goOpmerking is a varchar(5000) column, so obviously this will fail. But no one here has any idea why these get added. The live doesn’t have them. To illustrate:This is the production, with 5 constraintsthis is the test with 11I can not delete them, only add (nor would

I've had this issue before but this time I have more time to find a solution. On my database I can see that a specific column is set to nullable:[single_xml_file] [dbo].[checkbox] NULL CONSTRAINT [DF__label_hea__singl__628FA481] DEFAULT ('0'), But in Thinkwise this column is set as mandatory and when I look in the creation sql code I can see that it is set to NOT NULL.But when I execute “Create Definition”: And then “Execute All Validations” and after that “Generate Sourcecode...”: Next I connect to my DEV database and the SQL output shows:  

we have a web connection where we (temporarily) receive the bearer tokens via another way (yes i know, not ideal, hence temporary) and store them in a table. i have modelled the web connection with authentication type: bearer token and the bearer token as {token}.my question is: how do i fill this with the value in the table for every tennant?

Hallo everyvone,we currently have a customer who would like to use the database in MS Fabric. We are having some difficulty setting up the Thinkwise platform.Has anyone ever got the platform to work in MS Fabric? Is this even supported?Thanks and best regards from Germany.

All,From our thinkwise application we send email via SQl msdb. This works fine for years, but now I deployed a test application and emails with an attachment will not be sent. It’s a rights issue, the attachment is on another share, so not on the SQL server. If I start the application via the SF it works fine. If I start the application via IAM (not via Indicium so in the ini file RDBMS = SQLSERVER)an email without attachment is sent, an email with an attachment will not be sent.I added logging in my send mail script.EXEC xp_fileexist @FilePath;Die geeft 0 terug, wat betekent dat de Thinkwise app de bijlage NIET ziet.De SQL USER function heb ik ook in de logging gezet en die geeft terug: [domain]\srv_indiciumThe SUSER_NAME() is diezelfde gebruiker.En de ORIGINAL_LOGIN() is mijn eigen account.Zowel mijn eigen account als de srv_indicium hebben rechten op de share waar de bestanden staan.Als ik in de verkenner he

We have several tables where an image upload is possible. For end users it feels awkward that they first have to add a row, then push a "button” to actually have the GUI open the camera (or gallery) to actualy fill the field. Is there a way to have the GUI automatically open the camera (or gallery) to actually take a picture into the application?We are currently on version 2025.2 of the platform. I havent found a flow automation step that could handle this an automate what I want. 

In universal when a screen or connection takes a long time to load the data you first get a no results message in the grid. This is kind of confusing since it’s still loading the data. The message in the grid suggest there is nothing to show however the loading icon is still doing its thing. After a while the data shows. Can we replace the no result message with a: loading data, spinner icon or whichever makes sense.    

We are almost completely rid of the use of the old WIndows and Web GUI's, and users are more or less getting convenient with the Universal GUI's look and feel. But we are missing some functionality when it comes to Startobjects that users could define in the WIndows (or Web) GUI. When a users switched from the old to the new GUI, the startobjects are there (like menu items with tables that are by default opened). The sorting is not clear and different compared to the old gui's, but at least the open. But when we reset, for whatever reason, the user's preferences, there is no way to re-create the, for instance, startobjects, for that user. I haven't found the functionality in Universal yet to do this. So the user needes to go back to the Windows or Web GUI to reconfigure his or hers startobject(s), to get them working again in Universal.Any idea if this functionalitity exists in Universal, and if not when we can expect it there?

I don’t understand the drag and drop interface.I have a table “ams_location_object” and both a list and a tree view, in both the same happens.I select and item A, and I go to the side bar, drag another item B, onto an item C.I would expect that I get task parameters from B and C (I don’t know which one should be the task parameters and which one the drag drop parameters, that is the second question), but I do get task parameters for B and A. I don’t get anything from C.Trying it with an other setting I found that the task is from the target.So; task parameter = drop target, drag drop parameter = drag source.But I somehow don’t get the item I dropped on, but the selected item as parameter. That is only useful if you drop on the table, not on a row. It should work as you can reorder items in the software factory. Here I want to assign the parent on drop, so that reorganizing the tree view can be done without

Hi,I am running into an issue with going to the universal login page. Normally, when proceding to the weblink of universal (acc/prod) I get the following page. Continuing results in the following webpage: However, some users deleted the cookies for the universal webpage. Normally, this wasn't a problem. Simply refreshing the page results into the pages above and the user can login. But this time the users get the following screen: Since these users need to login via the SSO, this page doesn't work for them. The curious thing is tha

Is there a reason the dots on grid header for filtering are on different locations?  

Hallo,Would like to check, how to add a new user group to a user in IAM? I have a process flow to add a new user group to a user but the store procedure I'm calling seems wrong. Below is the sample of adding user group in user manually: For auto created user group I use the task_copy_usr_grp store procedure in my endpoint url on web connector process action.  Path: /indicium/iam/iam/usr_grp_usr(tenant_id=1,usr_grp_id='{to_copy_user_name_2}')/task_copy_usr_grp But not sure if the store procedure is correct a

in our proces flow we use a taask to fill a column which is used as the body of an email that is then send via the email connector.proces flow monitor is all ok, until the actual sending of the email, then the time-out occurs.credentials are checked and ok, smtp server is functioning. any tips on what could be causing this issue?

We have an editable grid and we need to enter some numbers on different records.After saving a line the grid looses focus related to the up and down keys.We have to select the line again with the mouse before we can move to the next line with the down arrow key. If we use the down arrow key directly after saving, the grid is scrolling, instead of moving the highlighted (=selected) line to the next record. 

The thinkwise documentation states that the end date of a user in the IAM controls the access of a user to the application. However, the user is still able to access the application after i fill in the end date. If i fill in the end dates in the user group of which the user is a member of then the user has no access to the application. I expected the end date on user level would be the primary end date. Am i mistaken about what the end date of a user does? We are using windows GUI and version 2025.1. The user is not an admin or have any other role in the IAM and authentication is through windows.

Hello everyone,As the title suggests I have the that error on indexes:I did see a post where a validation is supposed to be in place to prevent this from happening. But does that also count for when you create a unique constraint on multiple primary keys? Because I cannot find the validation and now I cannot (re)build my database anymore. I would need to fix this first, but in the newest validations by Thinkwise, a validation on this table would pop up urging it needs a unique constraint on the two primary keys used in the constraint. So what can I do to fix this? Did anybody else experience this problem? 

I’m experiencing a strange difference between previewing a PDF file, and a PNG image. The source of the files looks similar, but the PDF works, while the PNG gives a 403 error:PDF: https://domain.nl/Indicium_sf/sf/40/preview_with_label(7386)/TW_MODEL.preview_image_name(file_id='A259CDC87766E9A69B05A09FD7A33EE95838FF9CB6F18552E1D66F9208B2A70A') PNG: https://domain.nl/Indicium_sf/sf/40/preview_with_label(7384)/TW_MODEL.download_image_name(file_id=%27B79079422762AB11E4B466A35CEF645A745FB0D8E44687CB5AC8F9

When migrating our SF, we noticed our SF has several stored procedures that are invalid. For example the stored procedure ins_usr_branch, which has an insert statement with columns that don’t exist in table usr_branch ("read_only","read_only_allow_merging"). So I looked at the 2025.3 install script 115_Handlers.sql and I noticed that ins_usr_branch is not included, so it seems ins_usr_branch should not exist.I found that the upgrade from 2024.3 to 2025.1 (TSF_2025.1\SF\Upgrade\2024.3.11\115_Handlers.sql) created this stored procedure and in all upgrade scripts that came after this, it was never dropped. We started with the SF 2024.1 installation and we always used the Deployment center GUI to upgrade our SF (up to 2025.3). So why are these stored procedures never dropped? And could there be more ‘old’ objects in our SF database schema that should not be there?To fix this, is it safe to just execute the install code files 030-150 from the 2025.3 install package?