Are there any updates on this?
This does not work if the default behaviour of the prefilter is on like this?Is it possible to turn it off in my call?
A clever trick has been found.Make a prefilter thats always false. Set it on in main state Add a switch off prefilter process action to the flow VoilaThanks to @Kevin Rosink
Thanks I upvoted the ideaI will try to tinker with the view/document side a little.I was hoping there was a clever little trick I missed😉
Hi,You probably have to add it to your global configuration in IAMJust add an extended property named: DeleteAppointmentTaskSchedulerWith the value being the name of the task you want to trigger.
process flow monitor input add rowAh it seems to be the default indeed I did not notice it😅 For completionism sake here is the process flow input. Thanks
Hi Mark,Our customers name is abbreviated as a prefix in most domains so I decided to blur information that could be identifying but went a little overboard. I will make a ticket on the TCP and include uncensored screenshots. Thanks for your help.
Hi mark,I've attached a zip containing screenshots of all the task parameters settings and the settings page of the task. p.s. I also accidentally clicked the answer button on your reply and I'm pretty sure I can’t undo that
The value is now passed as table_task_parameter and fillsThanks that seemed to be the answer is was looking for.My confusion stemmed from the fact that for the resource_extender the use of table task parameters are not required since the extender itself passes these values.
Resulting task when used as starting pointResulting task when not used as starting pointHmm it seems to be that the fields that are not being filled are the fields that the scheduler fills not the default (so the resource(in our case users) and the starting time(where the item is dropped).So its not so much the defaults/layouts (i checked debug they do in fact fire) as the scheduler values not being picked up. Maybe adding them as table task parameters will do the trick?
Hey,stumbled upon this topic doing research for a system flow that needs to execute a task.If I am not mistaken we can now use task's in our system flows by using the process action“execute system task”.Wanted to put that answer here for future people.
Hi mark,That does not seem to be the problem because the icon does work (inverts color) when attached to a task. And it has no style attribute in its code. The problem is that when this(or any svg) icon is attached to a domain element as an icon it does not invert color's.
Ive fixed the decision it seems it was a problem with a renamed variable that i forgot to change.I am still not getting the process_variables into the message
Universal and Indicium are the following files from tcp:20211015_Incentro International B.V._Universal GUI_2021.3.11-b120211028_Incentro International B.V._Indicium (Universal)_2021.3.12I am using the SF model. What would a firewall error look like so i can ctrl+f in the logs.translation of messageThe translation of the messages works as follows the contents of the joke are assigned to process variables and and injected with {} into the message. The process flow is choosing the correct path in windows GUI not in universal since the response of the api call response is empty it does not set @type_of_joke and just follows both pathsdecision code
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
