We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.
We use 3 different kinds of cookies. You can choose which cookies you want to accept. We need basic cookies to make this site work, therefore these are the minimum you can select. Learn more about our cookies.
Learn how to make the best use of our community
Ask a question about how to use a feature in a specific situation
Share your idea to improve the Thinkwise Platform
In-depth knowledge of all the features
News and blogs on our products, services, and events
Release notes & improvements of all our products
Next steps for the Thinkwise Platform
Marketing content for System Integrators
Private forum for Thinkwise employees
Broaden your Thinkwise knowledge
The Thinkwise Community Portal
Thinkwise's showcase application
Hello everyone, In this release, we have made some usability improvements to the TOTP authentication setup, updated the DevExpress library, and improved the login provider selection process. You can read more about Indicium's features in the Indicium user manual. About Indicium Two types of the Thinkwise Indicium Application Tier are available: Indicium Basic (EoL): for use with the Windows GUI and Mobile GUI. This basic version does not support features such as system flows and OpenID. Download Indicium Basic release 2025.1.14 here. Indicium: for use with the Universal GUI and via APIs. This version uses the full range of Indicium functionality. Download Indicium release 2025.1.14 here. Contents About Indicium Contents New and changed TOTP token displayed when setting up TOTP License trade distribution Updated DevExpress library Minor fixes and tasks Questions or suggestions? New and changed TOTP token displayed when setting up TOTP new To improve the usability of TOTP authentication,
At this moment, the IN filter is only available for domain columns Would be very helpful for users to be able to use this filter on other domains as well
At this moment Excel style filters are not available on all columns. Using the normal filter is an option, but takes much more time for the user to set. Please make this available ASAP (MoSCoW - should) Also for other type of fields (not checkbox, date) Priority order: checkbox, combo box, date, other
Trouble shooting System flows is very time consuming. To make the process a bit more user friendly a "Run system flow now" button in IAM would be very helpful, so you don't have to wait for the system flow to start.
Please add an extra setting for tasks in SF to make it possible to select one of the following button sets to make applications more intuitive for end users. 1: Execute - Cancel (default)2: OK3: Save - Cancel4: Yes - No5: Yes - No - Cancel
In today’s world, staying connected is crucial, but there are still moments when users find themselves without internet access—whether during travel, in remote areas, or in places with unreliable networks. So I propose adding offline functionality to the Universal GUI. Features: Essential Offline Access: Users can access and edit data while offline, with changes automatically syncing once they’re back online. Lightweight Mode: The offline version could focus on key functionalities to ensure speed and security. Offline capabilities in the Universal GUI would greatly enhance the flexibility and robustness of the Thinkwise platform, allowing users to maintain productivity anytime, anywhere.
I am working with a grid where auto-edit is applied. In the documentation (https://docs.thinkwisesoftware.com/docs/sf/process_flows_actions#add-row) it says the ‘add row’ process flow action should not be triggered, but it does when the row is added by pressing enter when the cursor is at the last column of the grid. Is this a bug? I would like the process action to be triggered when the row is added regardless, but I believe that should not happen as is explained in the documentation. What is the intended behavior here? And is there another way to trigger a process flow action when a row is added on an auto-edit grid?
The Software Factory has a validation which informs you of indexes that are equal to one another and should be merged into a single index. Personally, I think having this validation is nice, but if you can inform me about this issue, why not resolve it for me. It would be great to have a way to automatically merge these indexes. I need a way to merge index together to help me save a chunk of time. Perhaps create an enrichment for this?
Process flows often requires you to create process flow variables. Currently you can select any process flow variable for the output/input parameter options of a process flow step. There are validations to check if a variable matches the required output format. I propose to limit the available process flow parameters to the allowed data types. For example: you never want to set a bit data type to a file name field. So when choosing the process variable for file name I only want to see text related data types.
Hello Community, We are trying to implement a radius search on a map element. We have a table with geocoordinates (Lon and Lat), which we can also convert into a geography::Point. For the purpose of planning, I now want to know when I am on a dataset, which datasets from the same table are X kilometers away to do further planning. On the MS-SQL Server side, we know what to do: declare @point geography = geography::Point(<Latitude>, <Longitude>, 4326); SELECT id, geo_pointFROM [table]WHERE @point.STDistance([geo_point]) <= 40000; -- input distance in meters But in the Sofware Factory / Universal GUI we are currently unable to find a solution. Clearly a task with the distance as a parameter and the current geodata of the selected data set. And as a result we could get a list with IDs which data records are within the specified radius. But how do we filter this and how do we prevent everything from being recalculated immediately when the data set is changed? Or are we thinking in the wron
Hello, Some questions on notification. When a process flow notification is triggered, users can see it upon logging into the system. But if the user is already logged in, how long does it take for the notification to appear for them? - I’m experiencing an issue where the notification sometimes appears and sometimes doesn’t if the user are already logged in. What could be the possible reasons for the notification not showing up consistently? How long does a notification items remain in the Notifications after it’s sent? I’ve noticed that once the status changes to 'Sent', the notification disappears. Is there a configuration setting to retain it for a longer period? or how can I see all previous items? Additionally, how long does the notification remain visible on the portal? Is there a configuration setting that allows us to adjust the display duration? Is there a way that I can capture the sent date when the notification is sent and capture the statuses (below) from IAM, which I can a
Hi, In my application I am trying to download a file that has been stored in a folder in a local file storage location. The file storage location is configured for the environment I am on. However, I am getting the following error when trying to open the file: The column that has the storage location is indeed file_name_queue. But the file_id is null, which would suggest to me that the file is not found. The file is stored in the folder of the storage location. What could be a reason that the file_id is null?
Hi, Is it possible to use the process flow monitor for system flows in a test, acc, or production environment? I think it only works if you are in developer mode and in all environments except DEV I do not get the option to test a system flow. How can I solve this? I am now missing the option to select a system flow and application when I start the process flow monitor.
Hi, I finally was able to fully upgrade to 2025.1 and fix all validations that prevented me from using the Universal GUI (only remaining is the Excel style filtering 🤐).I'm currently testing one of our applications in the Universal GUI and I notice that there is a discrepancy between the Windows- and the Universal GUI while displaying, at least one of my, dialogs: Even though I’ve set in the SF that the edit_unloading (Lossen aanpassen) checkbox should be at the top of the next column it is shown not at the top of the next column in the Universal GUI. I suspect that the Universal GUI uses a maximum height for the dialog and because of that moves the add_remark group to the next column!?Is there anything I can do to prevent this? But that wouldn't account for this similar situation in the same application: The fact that Universal choose to use 4 columns instead of 3 isn't a real big issue, I only added a “Field in next column” for the first “dagplanpartij” so the GUI is free to pick th
When I started with Thinkwise a few years ago our team was not completely using the Creation steps the way I was taught during the training.For completeness: we usually add a column, table or domain to TW and manually add it to the db using SSMS. The problem is that it is easy to forget to add the correct constraints etc… So periodically I would delete my DEV version and rebuild the db from scratch and then compare (using Redgate SQL compare) DEV to TEST, ACC and PROD. I'm trying to correct that but I keep running into situations that I need to manually alter the existing db.I've started out with a newly generated db for branche A and did some development work on this branchIn branch B I've added a new column to a table and did some development that uses that columnNow I’ve merged A and B to MAIN and made a new branch from MAIN which I'll call branch C When I load the new combined branch C I can see that the new column from branch B is existing.But when I run Creation > Generate defini
I have set in DevExpress that the amounts use a Dutch format, I also see this when I do a preview in DevExpress, but when I upload the report in the SF and generate a preview via the application, it uses the American format by default. DevExpress preview: Universal preview:
I've just recently upgraded to the 2025.1 version and I'm preparing the switch from the Windows GUI to the Universal GUI. I've noticed that the mandatory fields in the Universal GUi are a lot less visible than they used to be in the Windows GUI.Is there a simple way to make them a different colour like in this screenshot where I used a conditional layout (condition similar to 5 != 6) to force that this field is shown in Gold? Technically I could think of a query that automagically adds the desired conditional layout for every task field where “mandatory” is set to true to easily force this but that fielss like a very dirty hack 🙄Mainly because that is not what the conditional layout is for and it might even conflict with existing ones….
See all our upcoming events
Download the latest whitepapers here
Create a ticket in TCP when you have found a bug in our tooling or GUI
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
