Propose your fantastic ideas regarding the Thinkwise Platform to our Product Team.
When creating a view and the template to populate the view, it is necessary to keep the same field order. Also when expanding the view, it must be ensured that the field is returned in the same place by the code. It would be useful if this is not necessary, as long as you make sure the code in the template uses the correct field names.
Currently it's not possible to trigger a process flow (e.g. Add record) when adding a record from within a lookup.A workaround currently is creating a DB trigger. However, the downside of this is that you'll loose the link information within the SF.If performance could be an option, an additional settings for enabling process flows from lookup could be an option
When merging a branch you see all actions that have been performed on both project and branch. Currently there is just one prefilter for root actions. Looking at the columns there is no "Has conflicts” column that I can use to quickly find the conflicting actions.But in the end a "Has conflicts” prefilter would be great to quickly find those actions that need your attention. And basically merging is all about finding conflicts and resolving them.
In the userinterface of our application we have use background colors via a conditional layout. It would be helpful to the user if you could connect some text to the conditional layout which appear if you hover over the field on which the conditional layout is applied. So then user can instantly see what the color means.
Hello,I want to add a search field into a screen. Something like this but for the rows that are in my screen.Is that possible?
I have a status table with id, icon (upload) and name. It would be great to have the lookup combo as an image combo.
The ability to open a page more than one time the same way it is configured on windows GUI of the Software Factory by pressing the shift + page.This will provide the flexibility to have different content on the same screen which we need to compare the content.
Hello,We are currently using an external address validation API. Like many address validation APIs, this one also supports an "input parser". This would make it possible to get a correctly formatted and validated address back when typing an address. Would it be an idea to add a control of the type autocomplete (I am just saying). And this refers to the function to execute a "request" to an external API to validate the data entered and, where necessary, to complete it on the basis of the "response".Regards,Randolph
After validating definitions a usual result will be:Before continuing, I always want to be sure that any errors are insignificant (such as Control procedure is in development). Currently I would have to manually select the erroneous validation groups to see if it needs immediate attention or not.It would be nice if it was possible to automatically expand all erroneous validation groups to at least the next level.
Currently in our UI's if you create a table or view and include this column in the sorting the UI will create a left join to the lookup table. This is required to create the proper sortation. Obviously a left join is often not preferred. It should be an inner join, otherwise the query will not use the index.I understand that sometimes setting up this join as an inner is not possible, because if the join would return no value then the row itself would not be visible.Therefor I think the following solution would be perfect:If a column is not mandatory, the UI should always use left joins.If a column is mandatory, the UI should always use inner joins. However in the SF model it is possible to still mark the column as “use left join on lookup”. This is required when the lookup itself is a view that sometimes might not return any record.By changing this, the overall performance of all application will increase.
We recently discovered that the start-up speed of (grid) screens is partly determined by columns on which an aggregation has been set.Via Query Performance Insight of the database dashboard in Azure I found out that the aggregates are retrieved from the database with their own query.It would be highly desirable to make these queries visible in the Debug screen as well, so performance issues can be resolved more efficient.
Hi,It would be great if there was an option to allow the menu to be automatically expanded to show all active groups or specific groups.Eg. I want only Main group to be expanded but not the other groups in the menu.
I would like to see support for the HierachyID :In the GUI as a column where you can base a tree on or collapsable grid.
HI. I think the detail tiles can be better:The target of the detail tile, I would like to have the option to open new document (what it's doing now) or zoom (I guess in Universal it's a popup/modal).. The latter is missing to quickly see a detail and then just close the popup and go back to your main context. And, this spans out to the detail-tabs as well, the visibility of the detail could be part of the model, where you can have the option to automatically hide the detail (tile) when there is no detail information. The model contains already the necessary information to check this.
Hi Community,I would like to add a synonym list to my table columns so that they get recognized when an Excel document is imported. Now some columns don't get recognized when they are not exactly the same.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.