Propose your fantastic ideas regarding the Thinkwise Platform to our Product Team.
The size of the input fields in the filter-form screen component is currently determined by the size of the component itself. When the filter-form screen component takes up a small portion of the screen, the field-size of the fields in the component will be shortened to fit the limits set to the component. When using a filter condition the text inside the field gets cropped up to a point that it is hard to identify a filter condition (as shown in the screenshot down below).The only solution I see at the moment is to sacrifice page-design, and increase the size of the filter-form component as a whole.It would be ideal to be able to edit the field-sizes inside the filter-form component independently, so that it is not necessary to sacrifice page-design to increase user friendliness.
Instead of including config.json, web.config and appsettings.json files that break my instance after installing an update include them with a default_ or example_ prefix.That way I can just take the folder with the new Universal files and have someone paste them over the old ones. Now I constantly need to assist the IT staff because we don’t have access to the application servers.You should only need to touch settings files at the original point of installation and when something changes in said settings.
For big dataset it could help a lot for the performance to avoid using 'LIKE’ in where clauses. I wish a different behavior, depending on 'Filter Condition’ or an extra setting for this. Example: Combined filter value: 2019 2020 Result: SELECT .. FROM .. t1 WHERE (t1.[ACC_YEAR] LIKE '%2019%’) or (t1.[ACC_YEAR] LIKE '%2020%’) Should be: SELECT .. FROM .. t1 WHERE (t1.[ACC_YEAR] = 2019) or (t1.[ACC_YEAR] = 2020) When the Filter Condition is set to 'Equal to’
As a developer, I would like to hide action buttons and other functions in the form --Made by moderator
As a developer, I would like to position bars such as the Task and Report bars in any place on the screen --Made by moderator
Edited by moderator, the following ideas are created to replace this one:------------------------------------------------------Can the Universal GUI also be optimized a bit more for desktop users? I want to be able to give all end users a great experience.It is currently impossible to build screens that look really professional, do not raise questions and simply work pleasantly.For example:Be able to give fields in forms a minimum and/or maximum width (absolute and %) Be able to put tasks and actions in a logical place No prefilters, search field, Add and Refresh buttons in Forms They seem like small details, but they do matter and are necessary to gain trust with the end users
Hi All,Opening this as an Idea so that it can get votes and be implemented earlier. As per discussion on the Roadmap for the tooltips:“We are missing the Tooltips on Labels in Forms in Universal. We would like to provide the user once he hovers on the label of the field an explanation of what the field is supposed to contain in case the translation is not clear enouph.Right now we only get sort of tooltip with the complete value only when the value of the field is not fully visible. I suppose it should be configurable of what to show, a. the tooltip text or b. the value if not fitting the field width.”“Any given field I would like to specify a different tooltip when hovering the label of the control. Same way I define a translation for a Label I would like to specify a tooltip visible upon hovering the label.”“I expect the Universal GUI to read the Tooltip text column from the Subject > Columns > Translations and display that as tooltip when hovering over the (label/header of the) column. At least in the Form, but preferably also on the Grid header.”
If i’m correct, currently the grid row height set in the Subject is ignored by Universal. Because of this, we can’t show as much rows as we would like to. Why is this currently the case?And can we have this functionality in Universal implemented?
In our Enterprise Service Management Application, the core of the system is the creation of workflows. At the moment it works quite nice creating new table roles and adding the type of connections between the activities. How ever, users are often request for mor visual aid in creating the workflow. The visualization of the activities is already possible in the universal resource scheduler, however, the links are not possible. Could this be added, like it exists in the windows and webGui since 2021??
The Resource Scheduler pop-up is positioned below the mouse by default. This is rather annoying for users, as they usually navigate from top to bottom and left to right through the Planning screen. Could the pop-up show at the top right (not above, not besides) of the mouse?
At this moment a BIT value (0 or 1) is not accepted in Process/System flows as Variable for input parameter ‘Allow HTML’ (SMTP Connector).It will make configuration of process flows more easy to allow BIT values for any Yes/No type of Input Parameter and make the translation to the actual value (smtp_body_html_off / smtp_body_html_on) in the background.
I am currently testing ml on my laptop. So I have sqlserver, indicium and ml-docker image running locally.Training a model takes quite a long time. In my first tests I tried to train a table with 100,000 rows with 4 predictors. I left my laptop on and 8 hours later it was still training the first model. It would be useful to get a time estimation of how long it will take to train a model, so that it is clear whether waiting for the process is useful or whether it is better to use another dataset.
Can a ‘Refresh Model’ function be added to the Universal GUI?During development, when Universal is running over SF, it cost a lot of time to log-off an log-on every time.
I would like the ability to save my current screen as a bookmark in my browser (with filters/combined filtering e.t.c. just the current state). So i can revert back to that page. Not by “deeplinking”, but the behaviour that web Outlook 365 has when you switch between folders. This means i could also use my back and forward buttons in the browser. For example i would like to see this happening when switching to a different document:When i switch back to “applicaties” i would like it to see it like this:I think this would improve the usability on the interface.
In Universal images are fit by width in the previewer, why is that?Can this be changed so that the whole picture is always visible? The control type of the domain of the field in the table we use as data source is 'File Upload’ Or are there any plans to add a toolbar in the previewer like we had in the Windows and Web GUI?
Dear All,We have currently 2 applications being served from same database, more Applications to come on same database to address different needs of the business.We are publishing the Apps separately in IAM.We have separated the Roles&Permissions and User groups to serve each application accordingly.We have configured the User groups as defaults in SF so that we do not need to implement each time in deploayment from DEV-->TEST-->UAT--PROD(Live) the permissions. In each deployment we need to go and apply default authorization under Applicatiions-->Authorization tab in IAM button. This by default adds the Default user groups of all apps on the respective Published application.The Problem: I want to be able to remove from authorization fast and easy for selected User groups under my Application without needing to go one by one and remove the related Roles from under each one in order for the User group to be removed. EG. I am in Office application and I need to remove all User groups related to Mobile App EG. Vise versa I am in the Mobile App application and need to remove the Office application User groups.A simple and fast button to achieve that would greatly help in administration. We have the Apply defaults to add all defaults but we should be able to remove the selected User groups from the application with the same ease.
As a result of this thread: I would like to see the API call function for detail inserts even when the actual reference is not shown in the GUI. Because it doesn't make sense and we have to create unnecessary API variants to not show the reference in the GUI, but to have the ability to insert data via an API.. (direct insert doesn't work because of our hidden tenant_id in the key)..
CaseWhen adding a column to a table, often we have a generated trace column with a high order_no, this so the columns are always in the back of the table. When adding a new column the SF checks what the maximum order no is within the table, when there is a number with a bigger step then 100 the SF ignores this, which is really helpfull for adding new columns.In our end product we have generated views for history tables, these have an automatic generated reference with an order_no of 999, when adding a new reference this will get the max number + 10, so a new reference will be 1009, can you add the same logic for this order no as well?And maybe add this for all the functionality which has a automatic generated order_no?
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.