Propose your fantastic ideas regarding the Thinkwise Platform to our Product Team.
Is there a possibility to have a “read receipt” variable to SMTP connector?
We would like two additional parameters (acr_values, display) for the OPENID PROVIDERS definition in the Intelligent Application Manager (or indicium/appsettings.json). We need these paramaters for the eIDAS integration (openID provider) as part of the multi-factor authentication in our solution. See the example below:https://*************/AutentIDConnect/npa/authorize?scope=openid&response_type=code&redirect_uri=https*************&client_id=*************&acr_values=http://eidas.europa.eu/LoA/high&display=no_eidas_country_selection Some background information on openID standardhttps://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#AuthRequest
For several purposes it can be wishful to to have a multi-line field in the grid. It can save space on your forms if you can see the full text of a memo field at once in the grid.At this moment only one line is displayed and it can not be line-wrapped.So I would suggest to create this feature.
Hi Everyone,In our development in Universal Gui, we have some cases where we need to put large chunks of strings in grids or just some small group of texts that we need to squeeze between the columns. It would be nice if we have the option to define height for fields similar to what we have in forms.form field height I understand that modifying such property would apply to the whole line of record, Which I think makes sense. It would be nice if it would be intelligent enough for it to apply only when necessary. One record in with one column having big height.Wrap text option that will squeeze the text inside a column width.Having this with us will make records that are long be more identifiable with one look for users.I have read some ideas regarding row heights by modifying the Model Settings, but they tackle more on the general look of grids. What I’m showing with this idea is row height be applied to records that need them but not to all pages that don't need them, making this more flexible.
LLM can be used to analyse new features available between two versions. This can be derivede from our docs pages. This questions pops up evry time we want to upgrade a client to a new version. Only today I got this question for a upgrade from 2017.X to 2023.3 and for an upggrade from version 2021.3.
Ability to use the filter in a process stream
When you add a new domain and start adding elements to this domain, the Software Factory will automatically give the first element the database value 0. When using a numeric or integer domain and elements I personally am not a fan of using the database value 0. The value 0 indicates empty and is a value I often use in an ISNULL statement. This is way I prefer starting with value 1 instead of 0.Currently there is no way to change this default value. I would like this to be a project version setting.The reason why I would like to configure this is, prevent that co-workers in my team by accident will use value 0 instead of 1 and create an inconsistency.
A cool addition to IAM would be a task that allows you to disable all objects for a specific role which can not be accessed from within the application. This will allow you to disable objects that the user in theory could/should never be able to access.This will help prevent that users by accident have rights to tables which they should not have access to in the first place.They will not access the tables using the GUI but will be able to access them using a tool like MS SQL Management Studio or Indicium. This task will help you prevent this.
Having a couple of different base model linked to different work models we come across a small problem. After generating the “generated by control procedure” field is populated with the text “Copied from base model”, in my opinion it would be very useful to see from which base model this is copied, could this be added? Now we have to search the different base model, this would help a lot!It could be shown as something like this:"Copied from base model (MODEL)”
Some parts of your model can be created thanks to a dynamic model or from a base model.When it's created as part of a base model the text 'Copied from base model' is show by the generation info. Not only is the label 'By control procedure' not fully correct but the data doesn't give me enough insights, because sometimes there is something wrong in the base model and I want to fix that.But then you have to answer the question in which model do I need to fix that? Which you can from the user interface......Now i need to go to the database, query the right table to look for the object and search for one record that isn't generated. Lot of work and not doable for every developer. It would help me if the value in the control procedure would display: 'Coped from base model: {model_id}'
Right now Universal grids support Double-Click in grids to start a task/process flow for a whole record/line.In case we have multiple Tasks that are available to be executed for a row you cannot link the double-click of the row in the grid but we need a cell based assignment for the double-click. We require that we have a double-click functionality cell based. Meaning a certain task/process flow can be linked to a cell and upon double-click the task takes the related parameters from the row it is in.
With the new feature open document as floating popup available in Univeral Gui, it's nice to follow it up with another option to emulate lookup popups. Current ‘Open document’ processThe reason for that is in lookup popups, when it's opened it's the only focus of the page. Other components are un interactable, hence the grey background. Making the page opened needs precedence and attention from the user. Lookup Pop upWhile in the current one is that users can still interact with other components of the page. I understand that the choice was made because opening a page is the output of the process and lookup pop ups are pages opened while being inside a process like editing or adding a record. Open Document Pop up
One of the great features of the Thinkwise low-code platform in terms of development speed, is also one of the most annoying features from an end user perspective: the concept of Detail Tabs for related tables. It is very challenging to keep the UI clean and understandable when getting more and more related tables. We often have to revert to Views which combine a few tables in order to improve the user experience.Today, one of our users came with a simple, yet effective solution to reduce the end-user feeling of being lost in the jungle of Detail Tabs: whenever you click on a menu-item of an already Open Document the GUI should automatically go to the Main tab of that menu-item, instead of bringing the user back to the Detail Tab of the Detail Tab the user worked in last...NOTE: when clicking on the Open Document itself, I would expect to stay in the Detail Tab, but whenever I try to open the document again from the regular menu and I don’t have a Detail Tab in Add/Edit mode, the GUI must assume I’m done there and wish to start from the Main again. I noticed it doesn’t work like this now in either Windows or Universal GUI.Do you like it? Please vote!
We have a solution that based on row changes an automatic calculation is triggered. However when a user uses the mass import/update functionality in the GUI the first insert/update will trigger the automatic calculation. THis increases the risk of a deadlock. Is there a way to detect that a user uses the GUI import/update functionality so the automatic calculation can be turned off temporarely?
As discussed in below topic. I would like to see the ability to turn on/off mandatory pre-filter groups to deal better with variants and performance when a variant doesn't use the group.
When creating a new column in an existing table it would be nice to have a task to copy the right from an already existing column to the new column. This would save time in settings all the rights for new columns which are similar to existing columns.I use columns as an example, but this could be equally useful for prefilters, tasks, task parameters, etc..
I have a number of detail tabs. I'd like to give the tab a background colour depending on a condition. (So basically the functionality of the conditional layout, but now for tabs.)In this way I can indicate the status of the information in that detail tab and help the user guide towards the tab of interest.Something similar could also be of interest to a form. If a form has multiple fields divided over multiple tabs, and some of these fields are invalid (and have a red background colour), then by colouring those tabs that have an invalid field would help the user in finding these erroneous fields.
Currently the size in the universal GUI for images on a card list is fixed at 100 x 100 pixels. On mobile screens this is about a quarter of the screen width, see the attached print screen.I would like to have settings to configure the size of the image for a card list to optimize the configuration of the screen. Edited from here by moderator:@Harm Horstman added to this idea:We make use of card lists more and more, but we like to adjust the size of card list images depending on the subject and the type of images.This is needed to have more options to let applications look more professional like the examples below. We tried, but were not able to achieve this with custom.cssHopefully it is not to difficult to add some extra options to the card list settings in SF:Size: Small / Medium / Large / Extra Large (25 / 50 / 100 / 200px) Border radius: 0 - 50% Download button: Yes / NoSomething like this:
We make use of card lists more and more, but we like to adjust the size of card list images depending on the subject and the type of images.This is needed to have more options to let applications look more professional like the examples below. We tried, but were not able to achieve this with custom.cssHopefully it is not to difficult to add some extra options to the card list settings in SF:Size: Small / Medium / Large / Extra Large (25 / 50 / 100 / 200px) Border radius: 0 - 50% Download button: Yes / NoSomething like this:Of course we would like to hear it if it should already be possible with custom.css A related idea was posted 3 years ago
We have a TW application, running at several customer sites.One of the main forms is a view presenting a list of records.I want the possibility to add a default prefilter for an IAM user group. This prefilter will not be predefined in SF because the prefilter could be different per customer. So this is a consultancy solution. There is IAM, Authorization, User groups, Group preferences, Default prefilters; but here I can only select a default prefilter as created in SF. I need to be able to create a prefilter in IAM, based on a column value.I find something that looks like what I'm searching for, but this is per user and making it ‘default’ does not seem to work. This is in: IAM, Authorization, Users, User preferences, Prefilters. Here I can define a custom prefilter using the ‘prefilter columns’ tab. Only I can't get it to default activate after loading the application. It can be manually activated though, using the ribbon.I would like the same per user group, and the possibility to enable it by default when starting the application (when the form is loaded). Linked question here.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.