Propose your fantastic ideas regarding the Thinkwise Platform to our Product Team.
The setup of a prefilter state in a variant of a subject would be more user friendly, if I can set it up with a severity only higher than the current setup in the default. Now it is possible to make a prefilter in the default with ‘on hidden’ while it is possible to change this in the variant to ‘off’. This gives the impression that the variant will respond in the way I set it up, only to find out that it has changed back to the setting of the prefilter state of the default of the subject. If the prefilter state in the variant could be set up only from the setting of the default and upwards, (with a possible added bonus read-only ‘current default prefilter state’ field) it would be a lot clearly to the developer which options are available to use in the variant.
I would like to see the Query input field widened. Currently is hard to see what the query is without opening it. Especially when looking through multiple expression fields it would be great if I didn’t have to open every single one to see the query. Too smallMy suggestion would be to put Calculated field on it's own tab page, then making the field as wide as two groups together, so probably the Field width would be 660. Then also changing the height to 8 or so. For example: Much more space and better insights into the query
I wish that the multirow functionality, as is available for tasks, becomes soon available for reports too.
It would be nice if we could start a process flow on scheduled times, using the SQL Job Agent. At this moment an external call for a task with an attached process flow will not trigger the process flow.
I noticed there isn't a (complete) list of reserved keywords as a validation. A customer of mine had a upgrade go wrong because there was a domain with the name 'boolean’. Ofcourse that's not a good name, but the Software Factory didn't tell him in the validation, but only when the upgrade script went wrong. I suggest that the list is expanded and depending on the selected RDBMS available as a validation.
Currently we can't enlarge the Process action input fields and when I want to fill in a Constant Value, I notice it is kind of small. For example the Parameters (JSON), this is only one parameter. If I have 5 or more it will be very hard to see if everything is entered in the correct way. Also for the SQL, my query is small luckily but if it would be large, I wouldn’t be able to see all of it. I would like to see these field to be enlargeable, for instance by giving these fields a domain with Multiline control on it.
Currently within the Tasks and Reports items a user has the option to quick add a reference (and lookup) by using the task "Create lookup-reference". This is a good and quick way to set up an additional (parameter) with a lookup. I was wondering why such an option hasn't been added to the "column add screens" within the datamodel modeller. This could really save me a lot of time, when setting up tables that included columns with a lookup reference. Instead of having to go through all the steps: open the design tab, enable both tables and manually draw a reference between both tables, I could simply just run this task. It will automatically add my required columns and set up the reference with the preferred lookup.
Files used by an application, say images, reports etc., are store in a specific folder. In most cases the location of this folder is different for the development environment then it is for the production environment. IAM provides a task the update all the file links within a project version. This is a useful feature. However I would like this feature the store the altering made to the path (difference between development and production). Currently you have to update this path each time you synch a version, whether this is a new or already existing version. In my opinion this is redundant. IAM should be able to store the altering made within the path to set it the right path used in the production environment. Therefor automatically update the path upon synchronizing the next time.
I would like to have more features in the charts, for example: Running totals Moving average Trend line Regression line Secundary axis When I look at the DevEpress features, it supports a lot more than available in the SF model (e.g. series points (bar and line, with a proper legend). We should be able to model all the supported charts in the GUI (e.g. Gantt chart). Finaly, it would be great if we could select a ‘point’ or 'bar’ in a chart to show details (like we select a cell in a cube and show details).
I would like to see the added/active functionality of a subject, added in the menu item ‘Subjects’, to see what scripts are active for this subject.
Got an idea the other day to support a 360° view of photos. This would greatly benefit the software in my opinion. Let start off with what I mean: 360° photo viewer (Purely to illustrate)This is a series of photos that rapidly get presented to the user upon dragging to the left or right. In practice this could be used in factories for designing and checking products but it can also be used in shops to show customers the product in a 360° view. One way to implement this from what I found is this way: Not sure if this will be the final way of doing it but it gives an idea.
As a developer you have a lot of freedom when creating domains for your project. You can choose any name you like. Herein lies a tricky situation however. The developer can also create domains, with a name the same as default data types on the RDBMS, resulting in errors when deploying the model. At the moment there are no default validations for these kind of easy mistakes, so rookie developers can create these invalid domains and don't know why they are not allowed. To make the Software Factory as easy to use as can be, it would be beneficial to included these validations.
With many PDF documents it is possible to extract the content as plain text. This makes it possible to thoroughly automate certain document flows. This would be a welcome addition to process flows. Or perhaps it is possible to extend the existing 'Read file' action with this option.
For example, in SF the tab 'Table task parameters' should be disabled or hidden, as long as no 'Table task' record exists. I know, that in end user applications this can be achieved with a context procedure, but I believe this is generic logic.
Currently auto-refresh refreshes the whole subject it was turned on for. In my case I only use the auto-refresh option to show the user the active/up-to-date status of a row. Luckily it's not a very long list or anything so the refresh is very quick. It would be preferred, also performance-wise, to have a sort of partial auto-refresh where only a single column or multiple columns get refreshed. What do you think of the idea?
When I copy an existing application to a new one I have to select a new project version. Upon opening the combo box I see that the project versions are ordered oldest to newest. I do think it would be better to order it from newest to oldest. So in my case, 1.16 would be on the top and 1.08 on the bottom. Ordered old project vrs to new project vrs
When we open a look-up we get to see the option ‘Ok’ while there won’t ever be a moment we can use that button when in non-edit mode. We would like to see the button hidden.
The option no-check on references is something that we could use when applying a reference on a table that contains historic data from a old-application. For example you can only migrate the headings of invoices to the new system but no invoice lines. You do want that new invoices created in the system you are creating has a check constraint that is validated. But for old-data you want it not to apply. For this reason SQL implemented the No Check option on references… What i would like to see is a checkbox on the reference box where you can set the reference to be as a No Check reference. Why do i want this? Well i've seen many projects where people just toggle of the Integrity check on the reference. But do not consider that database could get corrupted when something goes wrong. Fixing missing data is harder dan solving the problem when the check constraint gives an error.
Currently when an idea, which I have submitted, undergo's a status change, I'm not informed about this status change. Personally, I would prefer to receive a notification of this status change. Is it possible to configure the community so that a user, like myself, receives a status update when an idea's, or its status, is changed? If this is not currently possible, it would be of great help to add this feature.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.