Propose your fantastic ideas regarding the Thinkwise Platform to our Product Team.
In GUI version 2019.1.16 flags for French, Spanish and Portuguese have been added. We would like to see a flag for Chinese added for the Chinese translation we made for our employees in China.
When our IBM i platform is closed (e.g. due to maintenance) and a user tries to connect from the GUI (front-end) to the database for verification purposes, this will result in a meaningless warning, this is not desirable. The expectation/assumption is, when the system is closed, this message always appears (with every SF version). After all, it is IAM that tries to connect to the target system in question. When this has to be adjusted, I expect that this is an adjustment within a procedure within the desbereffende IAM, there will have to be a better error handling regarding this point.
Currenty on a table there is an option "Start empty with filter". We use this option in a scheduler scheduler screen, as for different users the number of rows can vary and have negative results on performance. But the majority of user only have a limited amount of resources to manage in the scheduler. So an idea to create a processflow to determain wheter we're looking at the data as a "power-user" or not and so starting with an empy filter or not is not possible in a processflow. So an extra process action would be appreciated: "Open Filter" or something like this. Also ordering alphabetically in the possible actions, or a pop-up would make life easier....
Since SF suite 2019.1 roles have to be configured from within the Software Factory, instead of the IAM application. In order to test your role configuration, it is possible to set a specific role within a run time configuration. What I would like, is the option to set multiple roles within a run time configuration. In most cases you would to test a set of roles combined, instead of a single role.
I'd like to measure the productivity of SF developers (for example trainees) in the IAM. Now I can check the 'use log user actions' in IAM, or use the session/action analysis, but I'd like to see their activity on a day to day basis to see what they are doing and when/how long this takes. Maybe this can be solved with some default cube views on those analysis, but I think additional functionality (like a report) could give some usefull insights. Especially for the management of trainees, this can be a usefull tool. Not to 'spy' on them ofcourse, but to give insights and a topic of conversation during review meetings.
Not sure if I am the only one having difficulty to keep rights to fields / files consistant with the original plan when upgrading a project. But each time I add a field to a table for instance, it's a hassle. It would be a great addition to be able to select an existing field to copy all rights from. This could be achieved by either a new task or having the field editable (see screenshot). in this example I've selected a similar existing field first and selected all Rolls with reading rights. Then start the task "Assign Rights". If the Column field (Kolom) would be a dropdown for instance life would become a lot easier. A task would be much nicer. Two variants come to mind: "Copy rights to" and "Copy rights from"...
I would like to copy the rights from another object (of the same type?). When you use a "negative senario" (nothing allowed, unless), then it would be easier to copy the rights from another table or column.
For users it is useful to have clear insight into which tab(s) are still in edit mode. Can this be indicated by, for example, placing an exclamation mark next to the tab or in another way?
It often happens that code templates can be shared between different code groups. An example of this is a try-catch template that can be used for tasks as well as procedures, or a check that can be shared by context and a task. Idea: Templates not per code group but generally weave.
It would be nice to have badges on Prefilter Buttons, for example when prefilter buttons are used to filter rows by status. In that case the user can simply see the number of rows with certain statuses, and push the button to see the those rows. The application can be made more intuitive by this.
Sometimes we agree in my development team that specific validations should always be solved by the same developer. In that case we run the validations and assign them to the right person, using the assign task. Would you be interested in the idea to be able to arrange this in advance? We could add the developer field in the validation --> maintenance screen. When this field is filled, the validation task automatically assigns this validation to that developer. Of course you must be able to deviate manually afterwards for exceptions.
Currently I have defined a user preference Prefilter to hide these Validations from the list to prevent a long list of unchecked validations. Can we make this Prefilter standard available?
Often it makes forms more clear for endusers when labels of checkboxes are placed behind the checkbox. See below:
I wish to save credentials (HOST, DATABASE, UID) per environment (TEST, PROD, etc..) , so that it can be selected in the Synchronize popup.
A quick idea, when writing up requirements, it is sometimes useful to have them in a certain order. You can do this by changing the ‘sequence no’ field, but you can only re-arrange so much. I’d like to have options available similar to the ones to re-arrange the column order number of a table. So move up, move down and re-number. Be aware this request is not related to this one: https://community.thinkwisesoftware.com/ideas-18/renumber-requirements-task-230 Thanks!
As discussed here https://community.thinkwisesoftware.com/ideas-18/filter-in-treeviews-without-losing-parent-nodes-279 it would be very handy that parent nodes stay in the treeview when filtering. I've had numerous occasions that I filter and lose all parent nodes and giving me no information about the parent or the parent of the parent. So I would like to see the parent nodes of entries whenever I filter in the way how Arjan described: I usually solve this by using a hidden column, which contains the filter value of the parent node.
Within the new business process module in the Software Factory, you can't see who created or updated a process. I would like to see trace fields here.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.