Propose your fantastic ideas regarding the Thinkwise Platform to our Product Team.
Like us, most companies will use estimations when working on work items. For instance, when refining during a Scrum meeting. Estimations are an integral part of Scrum and form the basis for keeping control of the project. Currently it is not possible to effectively add estimations to work items. We mostly work with hours as estimation based on the Fibonacci sequence, but other systems are used in other companies (t-shirt sizes etc.).
We'd like to have rich text editing capabilities on the Description field of Work items. Right now we feel we have insufficient possibilities to style work items in a way that make them more readable for other users (and for the author). I know the field can be enlarged using the magnifying glass icon, but that only makes the field larger.
We would like to be able to add a default constraint to trace columns using the SQL functions SUSER_NAME() and GETDATE(). It should look something like this:
For each column in a subject you can indicate whether or not it should appear as parameter in various control proceduresAs this has nothing to do with performance but only with including/excluding parameters in program objects I propose this tab name is changed. Instead of Performance it seems that Parameters or “Set parameters” is more appropriate. .
One of our customers has switched from the Windows GUI to the web GUI. One of the differences that the customer came across is that de “Paste” option is missing in a detail menu (right mouse click on a memo field).Windows GUI 2019.2.17: Web GUI 2020.1.14: Of course I told the customer that he could use [Ctrl]+[V], but he just misses this option.Is it possible to add the option “Paste” toe this detail menu somewhere?
A client has a specific wish to be able to authorize process actions within a Process flow. The case is that there are two different roles, namely Opportunity and Assignment. Each of these roles have access to a task that changes the Status of an Opportunity.The difference between the roles is that:User1 with Opportunity role → can change the status and create an opportunity after User2 with Assignment role → can change the status and create an assignment afterThe process flow starts when activating this task and to determine what the next action is, we would like to apply authorization. User1 should only be able to create an opportunity after executing and not an assigment and User2 vise versa.Alternatively someone would say, why not make two tasks? The problem is there are also users with both roles and they would see the same task twice so that option doesn't work sadly. The task in combination with the process flow needs to be able to alter it's course on the basis of the users’ role(s).
This wish comes from an ISV;In the end product we have a lot of nice looking lists and forms where we make use of icons and sometimes even empty column translations. These columns we don't want to Export. Also we don't want to see these columns coming back when the user is Importing. Sadly there is no way in the Software Factory to effectively hide columns from the Import/Export panels. Export - The empty names should not be exported.
For tasks there is a checkbox allowing you the auto disable a task when the context is empty. I was planning on using this for a report. Unfortunately I was shocked to find out that this checkbox has not been implemented for reports. I would really like this checkbox to be available on reports
Universal 1.3 - “Open_documents” is growing and growing and after x hours my main menu is not visible without scrolling ;-) It would be nice to have a user preference to maximize number of menu options to show like a “Top 5” Additional options like “Most used”, “Latest”, “My custom” or “Pin” and even an option “Don’t show” makes it complete.
I made a process flow with (only) a message with options so I can define the actions depending on the user’s response. How does this process flow start? I presumed I could just send the message and trigger the process flow with that but it doesn’t work. I want to use it in a default procedure in which I want to send a warning before deleting a row in another table. In this warning I ask ‘ are you sure?’ . When the answer is no, the process stops. It seems I cannot define a starting point in the process flow. When I use the message now, I don’t get the options in it. It has to be simple isn’t it…...if you know what to do :)?
I need this sometimes. The workaround is to create a seperate task with the same templates, but that is not the most ideal solution
This simple SQL does the job, but would be nice when it becomes part of TSFDECLARE @project_id AS project_id = '[project_id]'DECLARE @project_vrs_id AS project_id = '[project_vrs_id]'INSERT INTO transl_object ( project_id , project_vrs_id , type_of_object , transl_object_id , transl_object_desc , generated , insert_user , insert_date_time)SELECT DISTINCT project_id = @project_id , project_vrs_id = @project_vrs_id , type_of_object = 13 , transl_object_id = value_string , transl_object_desc = NULL , generated = 0 , insert_user = dbo.tsf_user() , insert_date_time = GETDATE()FROM ( select s.project_id , s.project_vrs_id , s.extender_type_id , s.extender_id , property_transl = m.c.value('@property_transl[1]', 'varchar(100)') , value_string = m.c.value('@value_string[1]', 'varchar(1000)') from extender s cross apply (select cast(s.property_xml as xml) as property_xml) c cross apply c.property_xml.nodes('extender') as m(c) WHERE s.project_id = @project_id AND s.project_vrs_id = @project_vrs_id ) xml_flatWHERE property_transl = 'Translation object'AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM transl_object t WHERE t.project_id = @project_id AND t.project_vrs_id = @project_vrs_id AND t.transl_object_id = xml_flat.value_string AND t.type_of_object = 13)
The current version of the Universal GUI is not responding to the auto refresh settings of a subject.
Would be nice to be able to add a vertical line based on the group label in the grid. This way grouping can be made much clearer for users. Of course, I want to be able to set a color per group label.
Regularly I execute scripts generated during the SF generation process in SSMS. This is all fine, unless one has the wrong database selected… This happend to me once when I wanted to execute the VIEWS script in SSMS……. with the SF database selected. One of the first things that'll be done is deleting ALL views in the current database! As you can imagine, all kind of defects were detected in the SF afterwards, and in the end I had to rebuild the SF from the installation scripts (a restore from the previous night would result in the loss of all work that day from a couple of developers and designers). When the script is executed on, for example, a Navision production database all hell will break loose. So my idea: generate a piece of code in the beginning of each script like below (BAS_DMS_WORK would be replaced by the SF with the projects database). I tested it in SSMS and it works flawlessly. Is this something that can be built into the SF? Will it work when running the additional lines from within the SF GUI? print 'Check if current schema is correct'goif DB_NAME() <> 'BAS_DMS_WORK'begin print 'Fatal error, wrong database selected for projectversion!' set noexec onendprint 'Ok.... All clear, let''s continue'go-- Rest of generated script, like dropping ALL views...... This won't execute in SSMS the wrong database is selected.select * from work_orderselect * From part_alternative where part_id = 117396-- last line of the generated script-- Turn execution back on; only needed in SSMS, so as to be able to run this script again in the same session.set noexec off
It would be a great addition if the task ask confirmation option, including the message, could be manipulated through the default (or layout) procedures. So if I have a condition that is OK, OK, but I want to reassure through confirmation, or is an error. If all is OK, I don't need a confirmation, if I want the user to confirm, I can direct that. And if the message could also be manipulated I could give a informational, warning or error message.
We're currently missing the possibility to add custom fields to a work item. For instance: we want to use it to indicate whether or not a DPIA is deemed necessary, the origin of the work item etc. Of course we can just type that in the Description field, but then it wouldn't be possible to query on that field effectively and it wouldn't be sustainable for us.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.