Propose your fantastic ideas regarding the Thinkwise Platform to our Product Team.
Since iOS 14 also iPhone supports the Web Authentication API, Android supports this a little longer already. This functionality allows users to login on a website (or Progressive Web App) using their device-registered authentication methods (f.e. PIN / FaceID / Fingerprint).It is especially useful for mobile users, who need a quick ánd secure way to access our application. For example for field operations personnel that has to retrieve information for their next assignment, or has to register hours/activities. It would be great if Universal/Indicium support this authentication flow as well, enabling a more frictionless sign-in!
It would be cool to be able to login with Touch ID with the Universal UI.
You can use an Image combo to combine an image and text in one field. This is only for a domain with elements and I would like to do the same with a foreign key. That makes the UI a lot more visual and it is basically the same UI concept.
On a mobile device, you can select multiple rows in a grid, but not in a card list. Especially on a mobile device, card lists are used a lot because of the limited space. It would be great to have this option too.
After upgrading to 2021.3 our SQL server get flooded by process flows schedule logging. After a week there are more than 600K records. Would be nice if we can make these schedule logs optional.We even had some problems, see;
It would be a nice addition if the Maps component would support the Geometric type Multipolygon. We use the Maps component and the Geometric type Polygon to show f.e. the ECA zones at Sea. This works fine with the Polygon type, but this then also overlaps with islands in that area. The Multipolygon would allow for ‘cutting out’ inner parts of the Polygon, for example islands.Multipolygon
Personally I think it's a valuable feature to assign reviewers to work-items that are assigned to me. So it's clear who is responsible for a (peer-)review of my work. This is also due to the current code-review that let's you only review functionality code, but is apart from work-items. Sometimes I'm assigned to work-items that are not related to code, but just supports a certain work-assignment in the project/customer case that needs to be done inside or even sometimes outside the SF e.q. screen optimizing, set_up theme's, migrating test_data, etc… One step further.. The assigned reviewer of the work-item is presented on the task-board beneath the assigned work person of the work-item. Second step further.. It's an option to use the standard notification SMTP settings for letting people now that a generation process has started, is also used to let people now they have been assigned as a reviewer for a certain work-item. It can also be checked under 'review settings’. If assigning reviewers to work-items is required.
The score for the specific parts of the Quality dashboard are now calculated based on fixed guidelines by Thinkwise, like if the percentage of comment lines is 10% or above you get five stars.What if the guidelines of my company/project are higher, like say 20%, then the score doesn't make much sense to me.I think it would be beneficial to make these guidelines configurable, especially for our SI's & ISV's.
We have functions that use views and views that use functions which leads to incorrect upgrade scripts in the deploy packages which in turn leads to upgrade errors when trying to upgrade a system. This has a significant impact on the time that is needed to create, deploy and execute the deploy package successfullyWhen changes are (being) made on a view and the view is used in a function is something that can lead to upgrade errors on ‘FUNCTIONS’ because the changed ‘VIEW’ must be available in the system before the function can be implemented. Same the other way around when a function is changed and is used within a view. This also occurs when tables are changed that are used in a view.We would like to see that the deploy mechanism takes care of this situation and results in a deploy package that manages the dependencies between views and functions, and tables and views.
Deeplinking to a processflow in a Thinkwise application is already possible. But when a user gets (for example) an email with a deeplink to a processflow that confirms the timely delivery of a work order, he or she alway has to enter his or her cridentials and press Login.Wouldn't it be great to somehow have a javascrpt or other solution in on the login button (or login page of the GUI) that recognizes the fact that a username and password is already entered and automatically does the login? The username and password can be stored by the browser, so for a user it would seem as if the deepling really is what it pretents to be.
The GUI supports multiselect deletion of rows for a while now. The default GUI functionality that deletes multiple rows performs too slow and even slower than a task that does the same delete actions. Selecting all rows in a grid (more than 100) and starting the delete function takes a lot of time to ‘prepare’ the delete. Eventually a pop-up is shown with a confirmation message. Answering the confirmation message with ‘yes’ will start deleting the selected rows. The actual deletion process also takes too much time. Triggers play a role in this too. We would like to use the default GUI delete function as a set (just as SQL prefers) instead of row for row deletion. The Software Factory could have a checkbox for it in the ‘Subjects’ screen that is called something like ‘Multi-row deletion’.
The previewer is great but it is not so great when a row is selected with a .bak file. The GUI will load the whole file to try and preview it, but will not succeed as .bak files cannot be previewed anyway. Would be nice if the Previewer excluded this file extension. But of course there are more file extensions to exclude.Or; The Preview component should check the extension first before trying to preview filedata.
This idea is created on behalf of some of our users, combining their ideas into one.When saving a cube view as an UP cube view, it would be desirable to include some more data/settings:Prefilter state: for example, a detailed overview of hours will often cover the last period, where a trend analysis will cover several years. When you are always interested in the trend analysis, you have to activate the prefilter yourself every time. Active filters: any manual filters should also be saved. Selected print options: a user now has to reset these with every print. Expansion of rows: the rows are always expanded when working in the cube view, even when the rows were collapsed when the cube view was saved.
Currently the Software Factory allows you to assign a different screentype based upon a breakpoint. This is a very useful feature. Unfortunately you still lack the option to optimize the different screen layout. Because all subject configurations such as the grid, cardlist and form are still having the same setup. This leads to setting up a compromised setting for these components. So that it will work on a large and small screen.How great would it be to be able to assign a table variant based upon the same breakpoints! This will allow you to fully configure your table for multiple resolutions, and therefor devices.Obviously the GUI will do some scaling, to help with adjusting the grid and form, but often on smaller screens things such as the sequence of fields or the grouping of fields should be different. Users do not want to scroll before being able to see the most important data on this table.All of this can be configured if we could assign table variants to breakpoints.
At Deployment -> creation -> tab unit tests you can find many unit tests. It would be nice if there could be a progress bar that at least informs the user of the progress.
We can copy all row data by using Ctrl+A and Ctrl+C but even when I hide all other columns (through User preference) than the column I want to select all values from, it still ends up copying all the values of all other columns too. Maybe that's a bug but… What I would like to be able to do is selecting all values from a single column and copy it. Can we make this possible?
I would like to be able to change the icon next to the file upload field. In the application, gray icons are being used to open/start tasks and this task makes it possible for an user to upload a file. Currently there's a difference between my task icon and the file upload icon. If I could make these two the same, that would greatly benefit the look of the application. Difference in Icons
In the 2021.1 version of the Software Factory storypoints can be attributed to requirements/user stories and hours to work, which is definitely useful. The flexibility/usability of these elements would however be improved if the units of measure could be freely chosen in a future version.
I understand that this issue has already been addressed in However currently the order is confusing in the following way:Order of first column is: Table - Task Order of secord column is Task parameter - Column (so reverse from first column)I would like that the first and second column match. So this basically means that the order in the first column should be reversed (starting with Task and continue with Table).PS This also applies for Table task parameters within subjectsPPS Why are project and version visible from the subject and not from the task? Showing project and version is not something I see on other forms, so maybe removing them will be an extra bonus.
Currently in the Software Factory the checkbox Enable task/report in empty subject is set to true. Personally I would like the default set to false. In most cases the task/report should not be available when there is not subject. The exception is the case in which you would like to enable the task instead of hide it.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.