Hello,In the grid of a view I use Conditional formatting to color rows red: The red color disappears when a number of rows are selected: Is there a way to five selected rows a different share of red or to prevent the selection to change its color?
Hi!I’ve checked the community regarding refreshing tables in process flows. But I could not find a solution which complies with the wishes of our users.Our users mostly work in the windows GUI. One of the processes includes a view with a task. A pop-up containing another view appears after the user clicks on the table task. When the user is done with the pop-up, it is closed automatically. The previously mentioned view is still present after the pop-up is automatically closed. But I want to refresh that view. I have tried the following:Open document (try to use an existing tab = yes). Change filter (to open the record) Activate detail Refresh tableThis does work. But is not practical because it clears the filters applied by the user. It also takes some time because it tries to re-open the view. Auto refresh is also not very practical in our case because the view can vary from a couple of records to thousands. Can you help me finding a solution which might be faster and does not clear t
Hi,One of our users reported that filtering does not work in the web GUI. It is possible to use the search bar, but they also want to filter per column. I might remember it incorrectly, but I thought that would be possible in the web GUI by using the quick filter. I’ve checked the documentation: https://docs.thinkwisesoftware.com/docs/user/universal#search-and-filter-barAnd it states the following:Is there another possibility to enable this type of filtering? And what might cause the ‘technical limitations’ in this case.
Hi, When a task is executed on the selected rows the windows GUI cancels the selection and highlights the row where the arrow is located. Is there possibility that the Windows GUI does not deselect/cancel the previous selected rows?Before running a taskAfter running a task
Hi!I am working on a link task where the user wants to ‘import’ data from one table to anotherFor example: Purchase orders can be generated through a purchase needs table. The purchase order table consists of purchase order lines. The user also wants the possibility to import purchase needs into an existing purchase order. I set up the following process flows:Process Flow 1The user clicks on the link task located in the purchase order line. The purchase_order_id is one of the task parameters. The purchase needs table is opened (as a floating document) with the necessary active filters. Only active purchase needs with the same supplier as the purchase order’s supplier are shown. A hidden column ‘link_purchase_order_id’ in the purchase_need is filled with the purchase_order_id. This is done in a decision process action.Process flow 2The user must be able to select multiple rows in the purchase need table. A decision performs an update and empties the ‘link_purchase_order_id’ of all unse
Our organization uses order folders to log different kinds of order reports. For example: order confirmations, shipping orders, certification etc.I have created a system flow which receives information through a HTTP connector (from a process flow). Six (DevExpress) reports are generated this way and eventually written into an order folder. This works fine for three reports except for two documents which contain scripting and one report with a watermark. The report is saved into the correct folder, but it’s empty. As if no ID was forwarded to the generate report process action.The document with the watermark was eventually saved successfully when we deleted the watermark, but this is a rather inconvenient ‘solution’. Is there a known issue with generation and writing reports which contain scripting and watermarks? Process flow with the HTTP connector System flow for generating, writing and moving a report.
Hi!I want to generate reports and save them locally. One process flow fetches the shipping_order_id from the table and sends it to my system flow which consists (more specifically: consisted) the generate report and write file process actions.This actually worked a while ago. I tested the processes with Postman and variable shipping_order_ids and still get the HTTP response 204.A decision is used to log the output of the process action and the variable shipping_order_ids. I ‘dissected’ the entire system flow until I came to the conclusion that the generate report process action was not outputting anything.
I want to print a report x number of times. This value x is stored in a column called ‘print_amount’. For example: The ‘print_amount’ column for record A is 5. This means that the report regarding this item must be printed 5 times. This value may change to 2 for record B, thus the next report must be printed 2 times.I’ve added a report parameter called ‘print_amount’ and it’s linked to the stored value in column ‘print_amount’.It works fine when I’ve enabled ‘Popup for each row’. The problem is that the user must confirm the printing of the report for each record. This is inconvenient.When you disable ‘Popup for each row’ the first report parameter value is applied to every other following record (in the example above it’s 5). Therefore all reports are printed 5 times instead of their designated value in the stored column.Is there a way to make it more convenient for the user while making sure that each record’s report parameter is used?
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
