Replies posted by Arie V

440 Replies

J. de Lange
Captain
J. de LangeCaptain

Merge a branch to another branchNext release

@Anne Buit That shoulds like desired behavior to me! Since both of the Feature branches are from the same origin branch, we would definitely want to have all changes merged. We're eager to see this feature coming.

13
Anne Buit
Community Manager
25 days ago
mperrott
Hero
mperrottHero
asked in Questions & Conversations

IAM auto-provisioning of Users

Hi mperrot, Self-registration via OIDC is currently supported because it delegates the authentication process to a trusted OIDC provider. @mperrott following up on this suggestion from @Anne Buit: how about the Azure Self-service sign-up flow that you could optionally combine with Google / Facebook / personal Microsoft accounts, but all working through the Open ID registration between Thinkwise and the Azure AD tenant you have already configured? https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/external-identities/self-service-sign-up-user-flow  

7
A
Superhero
4 months ago
mperrott
Hero
mperrottHero
asked in Questions & Conversations

IAM auto-provisioning of Users

@mperrott how about using OpenID with Microsoft with any of the other values? https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/v2-protocols-oidc#find-your-apps-openid-configuration-document-uri If other companies in your group use Azure AD as well, you could specify per tenant (similar to your current setup) If other companies in your group use Azure AD, but you don’t know these org’s details, you could use organization If users should (also) be able to use their personal account you could use consumer or common —> I believe this also works for users that register their Google account (f.e) with Microsoft, but of course you could then also setup OpenID with both Microsoft consumer and Google

7
A
Superhero
4 months ago
B
Vanguard
BramGVanguard
asked in Questions & Conversations

Detail tab page icons appear to be inconsistent

@Mark Jongeling Could the issue as mentioned in this other topic be the cause for this issue too?  

15
A
Superhero
6 months ago
S
Sidekick
Spyros.NeofytouSidekick

We need to be able to open a document from a process flow, not as a new screen, but as a pop up screen.Completed

@Dick van den Brink these Release Notes state that a new tab is opened with using Open Document as Floating document, but this Idea explicitly asks for opening a Document as Pop-up window (I imagined this to be similar to Lookup pop-up windows) and not as new window. Then how is this Idea solved?And given this remark:The process flow does not continue in the floating window.What does this way of implementing the Open Document as Floating document add compared to the also existing Open link process action? 

15
A
Superhero
6 months ago
Kasper Reijnders
Kasper ReijndersPartner

Add button in Indicium to redirect to the appCompleted

Good idea indeed!

5
Mark Jongeling
Administrator
6 months ago
Freddy
FreddyThinkwise Local Partner Brasil

Visual indication model is loading.Open

 @Freddy The ‘lagginess’ of the Universal GUI you describe is also very prevalent to us as well (not only on our Vessels). With the risk of getting to far astray from the Idea originally posted here, there are a few things that come to mind related to this topic:With regards to the comment by @Erik Brink in this topic on Context procedures: we have indeed TCP 6859S open. I really think it is a very big risk that we can start a Task while the Context is not yet loaded, and believe that the GUI should be much more restrictive/prescriptive than it is. I would say that logic like Layout and Context needs to be finished before a user is allowed to do the next action on the same record. But we've had this same discussion with also @Anne Buit on Process Flows. Back then we kinda disagreed: I want to have stuff like the Context procedure and Process Flows water tight, to prevent by all means possible that users do things they are not supposed to do, but Thinkwise was more lenient to the idea o

9
A
Superhero
8 months ago
J. de Lange
Captain
J. de LangeCaptain

Merge a branch to another branchNext release

@Anne Buit @Mark Jongeling Since @J. de Lange is on a long holiday break, I’ll answer on his behalf: as far as I can tell this is exactly what we would want!We’ve been in the situation too often where we’re developing on 2 different Releases (each having their own Release Branch and their respective Develop/Feature branches) and at some point we’d conclude that we needed functionality from one another. However, having to merge incomplete Releases to the Main for this purpose was not always desirable or feasible.Now, what I understand from the examples from Anne, this scenario would be resolved since the 2 Releases share the same Main and all changes since will be merged without impacting the Main itself at that point in time.@Anne Buit why wouldn’t your solution cover the Idea? Is there a caveat/what are the disadvantages of your solution?

13
Anne Buit
Community Manager
25 days ago
S
Apprentice
SuleymanApprentice

Changing Role name in SF requires re-assigning to User Groups in IAM - this could be easierOpen

@Mark Jongeling how about applying Data Migration-like logic here that identifies Renamed roles versus New/Removed ones? Similar to how Table & Column renames are handled in Data Migration at the moment. @mperrott thanks for sharing that Default User Groups works for you! We did give it a try after the initial introduction, but back then it didn’t work for us, given the way we had setup multiple Applications on a single Database. We abandoned that setup, but never looked at Default User Groups again. We’ll make sure to revisit them! Nevertheless, the Idea is still valuable I’d say.

5
Mark Jongeling
Administrator
8 months ago
S
Sidekick
Spyros.NeofytouSidekick

We need to be able to open a document from a process flow, not as a new screen, but as a pop up screen.Completed

Great, looking forward to this feature!

15
A
Superhero
6 months ago
G
Apprentice
g.c.d.vanderschootApprentice

Universal - position action buttonsCompleted

@Mark Jongeling Ah, I see it was sort of released as a Hotfix: 🚀 Platform improvements for week 20 | Thinkwise Community (thinkwisesoftware.com)We'll play around with it.

10
A
Superhero
8 months ago
G
Apprentice
g.c.d.vanderschootApprentice

Universal - position action buttonsCompleted

@Mark Jongeling When and how exactly has this been delivered?

10
A
Superhero
8 months ago
P
Rookie
PeterKeerisRookie
asked in Questions & Conversations

Problem with keeping branches open after merging and deleted objects

@PeterKeeris great that you managed to find a reproduction scenario for issues related to reusing Inactive branches. We have had some headache experiences with this as well, so internally agreed to never continue working in a merged branch. However, we never really got our head around what exactly goes wrong, which is why we never raised a TCP. Thinkwise should properly fix this, so hope you raised a TCP issue? 

4
Anne Buit
Community Manager
8 months ago
A
Superhero
Arie VSuperhero

Determine if next Process Action should be executed immediatelyPlanned

@Anne Buit @Jeroen van den Belt Since this was marked as Planned months ago, we kinda expected this to be part of the 2023.2 Release. It doesn't seem to be there (yet), but we're still eagerly awaiting this significant performance improvement! When can we expect this?

9
Anne Buit
Community Manager
9 months ago
L
Linde van DyckPartner
asked in Questions & Conversations

Sending out a message while scrolling trough a calender

@Linde van Dyck we have experienced the same undesired behavior and raised this as a bug in TCP 6523S.

1
A
Superhero
9 months ago
H
Captain
HarryACaptain
asked in Questions & Conversations

How to prevent "Request error. The object was not found. You may have insufficient rights or the object no longer exisits."

FYI: after further investigation we found that Auto-edit somehow was still enabled on the Variant, while Edit was disabled (and thus causing the setting no longer be visible in the SF). After disabling the setting, our error is gone.For the SF issue we raised TCP 7209. 

15
R
Sidekick
8 months ago
H
Captain
HarryACaptain
asked in Questions & Conversations

How to prevent "Request error. The object was not found. You may have insufficient rights or the object no longer exisits."

@Vincent Doppenberg Any insights on whether we can suppress this error if it is actually intended to get this record deleted?

15
R
Sidekick
8 months ago
Jasper
Administrator
JasperAdministrator
published in News & Blogs

Upload multiple files using the Universal GUI

FYI: we took this solution to our Production environment this week and our users love it! We took the solution provided by @Jasper as a starting point and tweaked it here and there to fullfill our needs (thanks for the support @Kevin Horst!).Some remarks on our setup:We use Dynamic model code to create the multi-file upload and attachment tables for Subjects with the applicable Tags. This makes it very easy to re-use this solution across our application. We parameterized the upload URL in the upload page, so we can use a single HTML page for this component, while showing the upload page at different Subject detail tabs. We improved the upload page javascript to provide feedback to the user on the status of the upload (e.g. orange = uploading / green = uploaded / red = error during upload).  We also use the Auto-refresh and Change detection logic to refresh the Subject after upload Note: in above example we use Conditional formatting to highlight that a user has to update the Attachment

111224
rbiram
Hero
8 months ago
Freddy
FreddyThinkwise Local Partner Brasil

Standard API for combo elementsOpen

@Freddy If I understand you correctly: you would like to be able to receive the Domain element translation as part of a regular API call to a record? So for example: if you wish to receive a Contact record and the gender is registered with a Domain with elements, you would like to be able to retrieve the gender translation (e.g. male or female) to replace the 0 and 1 domain elements as part of the regular API call to the contact table.If yes: sounds like a great idea to me!

7
Freddy
10 months ago
A
Superhero
Arie VSuperhero
posted in Questions & Conversations

User Experience Universal GUI - Votes collector topic

@Mark Jongeling kindly updated my original post, so for each Idea the current status is visible. Good to see that the low-hanging fruit has been picked and released in the last few Universal GUI releases 😀 Let's vote and hope to see more of these great Ideas being released soon! 

12
A
Superhero
11 months ago
A
Superhero
Arie VSuperhero
posted in Questions & Conversations

High latency / low bandwidth optimizations Universal GUI

We are testing with Brotli compression and the initial results are promising! Indeed a 90% compression on loading the Universal GUI for the first time:  

7
A
Superhero
11 months ago
A
Superhero
Arie VSuperhero

Differentiate Zoom screen in Open DocumentsCompleted

@Tim de Lang Nice! Could you already give a hint on how exactly will this Idea be solved?

9
Erik Brink
Moderator
11 months ago
Freddy
FreddyThinkwise Local Partner Brasil
asked in Questions & Conversations

Indicium console log - dbug messages

@Freddy Totally agree that is should be disabled by default! Please make sure to add your vote to below Idea. @Vincent Doppenberg Promising! Haven’t seen any traction on below Idea, but is this planned for 2023.2 already?  

10
Mark Jongeling
Administrator
1 year ago
Freddy
FreddyThinkwise Local Partner Brasil
asked in Questions & Conversations

Indicium console log - dbug messages

@Freddy I believe this message is added since the Breaking change in Indicium 2023.1.13I haven’t double-checked, but it could be that this message is shown for every primary key for which the default input/output parameters are still enabled on Subject settings.Most certainly @Vincent Doppenberg can clarify when exactly this message is logged.

10
Mark Jongeling
Administrator
1 year ago
Remco
Moderator
RemcoModerator

Able to hide a task in the taskbar when task is used for double clickCompleted

@Jasper We ran the hotfix to get the Display type setting available in the SF already. As a result we currently see the following for one of our (still hidden) Grid double click tasks in SF 2023.1:To confirm: will this setting imply that from 2023.2 onwards the Task will be displayed on the Task bar? And if we wish to keep the Grid double click Task hidden I presume we need to use the ‘Hidden’ Display type option? If so, should we run a script to update the Display type setting to ‘Hidden’ for all Double click on record = true or will such a script be included in Release 2023.2? This to ensure that the GUI behavior is not changed unintentionally.

9
Jeroen van den Belt
Administrator
9 months ago

Badges

Show all badges
Terms & ConditionsCookie settings