Propose your fantastic ideas regarding the Thinkwise Platform to our Product Team.
This idea focuses on a new setting for tasks. This settings would allow you to indicate whether you want to receive confirmation that the task has run successfully after its execution.For some tasks you just want to be sure that they have been run completely and successfully. It would also be ideal for situations where you work on some other things while the task is running. You will then be notified when it is completed.Currently, this can be achieved by writing additional code or including the task in a process flow. I would prefer to have a formal setting in the model to do this.
I would like to have the option to colour items in a dropdown. something like a conditional layout in a table column.e.g. to express a preference in wich items to choose from the dropdown first (green items are the prevalent values, yellow are next, red are last)
Expectation is that if it is a single page is under a group that we have the page elevated, to eliminate too many actions on the menu itself. User does not need to go from group dropdown to click on single page of the group. It needs to elevate the page in place of the group and no dropdown.
With menu list and menu treeview you always have to have at least a group. Usually this is fine. Unfortunately there are situations in which a specific menu item is requested to be directly clickable, without first having to open the group.This seems currently impossible, but would be a nice addition.
When adding data conversion it would be great to have other options than only adding a constant default value.For the develop environment this may be sufficient, but when setting it through to other environments you lose the option to look into the database and see which constant value is appropriate.Being able to have expressions you can at least determine an appropriate value. Being able to add a script, you even have the option to add a dummy record and reference that one. This particularly when a foreign key field changes to mandatory.
9 out of 10 times when creating a new project we create a work project. when people are new to the SF it can be very confusion to have the option 'work or base' project. Would it be an idea to remove this option when creating a new project? Every project you create will be a work project. When you like to create a base project you can go to the variant in the advanced menu.
An idea to make a domain control type that is a button.At this moment i'm using a check box instead of a button.
Can 'Theme', 'Default Menu' and Language be added as optional fields in Runtime configurations in SF, to test various themes and menu's during development more efficient?
I wish to have an option to skip all read-only fields, after entering a value in a field.In some scenario's the tab key must be pressed multiple times to reach next fiels.
We need to have a Home button in the top ribbon of the Universal GUI to be able to return to the initial login splash page or to a predefined default page.The problem is when having the option to Hide Documents as enabled, means you cannot see the opened pages and you cannot close them. If those are not visible to close them, you can’t really see the initial login splash page at any time after login in.The requested solution:
What I miss from time to time is what domain a selected column uses in the application. I would like to see that in the Path Location screen. Can that be made available? Adding Domain field between Column and Context
At the moment when you open the dropdown menu the first option is a white space, but we do not want to see the white space in a combo/dropdown menu.From a user(s) perspective: A user would click on a dropdown menu and see only the data field which are selectable. The white data field won’t be presented.BeforeAfter
Currently the Software Factory offers several options to automatically refresh data on your screen, such as the following:You can set the auto refresh based on a specified time You can refresh it by implementing a processflow that upon activating a specific document the document is also refreshedThe first option is an option which is pretty simple to configure for multiple screens. The second option will cost you allot of time, if you need to set this up for several screens. I keep running into cases where I need to implement the second option for allot of screens. Therefor I would like to request a checkbox for the second feature on the table (variant), similar to the checkbox available for refresh option one.So in summary, I would like a checkbox on table/variant level to automatically refresh the table when activating it as a document.
In every application there is some kind of data input validation needed (with regular expressions). The only options we have for data validation in the SF are defaults and/or triggers. SQL support for regular expressions is quite limited. Adding data validations in the SF feels cumbersome to me.Why don't we make use of HTML5 input validation with the pattern attribute on the input tag. We get full support of javascript regular expression and it's much less work to add data validations. The validation can also be blocking, so the user can't submit the form/data if the data is not in the correct format. The validation message displayed to the user is also way more intuitive then a pop-up message from a default or trigger:
With the Universal GUI come great visual features, one of those features is the in-line Domain min/max and Mandatory field validation in Universal. In addition to those standard validations we would like to display Modeldriven custom in-line Field validations as well. Compared to alternatives like the snackbar and pop-up this in-line field validation message serves end users much better as attention is immediately drawn to the applicable field(s). Imagine having a domain for an email address: we always want to validate this email address with a regex: [a-z]*@[a-z][a-z]*.[a-z][a-z]*. We want to do this for every field with this domain and we want to show a message that the email address provided is not correct. But what if we can put the regex in the SF behind the domain together with a msg_id?Then when a user enters an invalid email address the message with msg_id provided in the domain_validation will show up (even with parameters such as col_id_transl) and the field will get a red border so the user knows instantly where the error occured and what is wrong.We can also imagine that we get a validation that we cannot model and we have to write code for, we could maybe add parameters to the layout procedure:@col_id_validated int@col_id_validation_msg_id msg_idIn the layout procedure we can put a @col_id_validated to 0 if we want to raise an error, this way the GUI knows to put a red border arround the field specified and the user cannot save the record, optionally you provide a @col_id_validation_msg_id to show as an inline message to the user.It relates a bit to another great idea “Validate field input value without using a default/layout/trigger”, this idea adds how the Universal GUI should then display the validations.
The same option as was added in the 2020.01 release of SF for tasks ('Enable task in empty subject’), would be nice for details and reports too.
This is for Universal GUI.As a user I would like to update/change my password while already logged in the application.It would be useful for users to have that ability provided to them in the Account menu.
What I noticed is that I can only define a single Font to alter the field text but that means the dimension columns and values share the same Font. I rather have the ability to make the Column names Bold and the Values regular. Dimension Column names and Row values share the same FontCube fields are defined as Dimensions and set as Row fields (first 4 fields)
If you want to keep the screen as clean as possible, it is possible to hide the prefilters. To alert the user to an active prefilter, the suggestion is to give the prefilter button in the ribbon a background color (like the one below, when hovering over it), when at least 1 prefilter is active. When checking whether a prefilter is on, you must also include your own prefilters (eg UP). A hidden prefilter (even if it is active) is not included in the selection. In addition, I understand that in the Universal GUI there is the possibility to place (all) prefilters behind the vertical 3 dots. I would also like to see the above principle again by displaying the blue line under an active prefilter under the 3 vertical dots if at least 1 prefilter from that list is active.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.