Propose your fantastic ideas regarding the Thinkwise Platform to our Product Team.
We are about to move our users from IAM to External authentication type. Testing and reviewing this migration proved very simple: I only have to change the authentication type for the user from IAM to External. This change seems to do nothing more and nothing less than updating the authentication type of the user in the usr_authentication table. The great benefit of SSO is not only a better User Experience, but also improved security, as it eliminates the need for storing User credentials in different systems (i.e. it reduces the ‘attack surface’ for hackers). For the purpose of improved security I would therefore advocate that the (now obsolete) authentication details from the usr_authentication table in IAM should be deleted when changing from IAM to External or Windows authentication type.I intend to run this script myself after having updated the authentication type, but I would rather see IAM doing this by default:UPDATE usr_authentication SET two_factor_authentication_type = 0 , totp_key = null , totp_active = 0 , password_hash = null , password_salt = null , password_algorithm = nullwhere authentication_type = 4 and password_hash is not nullNote: to make sure this doesn't happen accidently or unnoticed, I would recommend adding a warning message or confirmation when an administrator is changing the authentication type from IAM to External.Note 2: I am not certain about Kerberos authentication type, but I think the same would apply.
There is a wish to be able scale the print (preview) of for example the graphical planning to a single page. It doesn't matter you have to scale up the to e.g. an A2 or A1 paper to fit everything.The customer would like to incorporate tangible overview of all of the activities in the the workspace as as it would support the core of the business. Now the graphical planning is almost useless outside the TW application.
I would like to have the ‘Generated’ property available for process actions and process variables. (Possibly process steps as well since these are dependent on process actions and might cause errors during generation if these aren’t generated as well)I am running into problems with partially generated process flows. A process flow can have the ‘Generated’ property in the SF but individual process actions and process variables cannot. This causes some issues when adding process actions/variables through the dynamic model. To manage these generated process actions and variables, we have to write code to check for them and delete/update them when needed. This is functionality that is available for most other objects in the SF by default.There is also the problem that dynamic model code to manage these object without the ‘Generated’ property can only be executed after the other generated objects are automatically deleted and re-created through the generation process. (Because it is impossible to execute code from the dynamic model before the ‘delete generated objects’ process during generation.) In some cases this causes errors during generation when these objects are dependent on objects that do have the ‘Generated’ property.I’ve noticed that these objects do have a ‘Generation’ group label under ‘Trace info’ but the only column available there is ‘By control procedure’. Does this indicate that the ‘Generated’ property is planned to be added in a later release?
Currently the alignment of column headers is identical to that of its domain.We would like to be able to set the column header alignment independent of the domain, for instance to have this default centered or left aligned.Of course this should then also be integrated into the various GUIs.
There was already a question about the possibility to specify a custom color palette. Unfortunately, this is not possible at this time, but it would be nice.I would also like to have an easy way to determine the color for a specific value. This makes the result for the end user more intuitive. Take for example a color based on a certain status (On time=Green, Little late=Orange, Much to late=Red).I know you can try to achieve this in the executed query by forcing an order and existence of all possible values, but that is cumbersome. It also effects the performance. It should be easier.
When you are using quite a few tile groups, you will have to use the scroll option within this menu often. However after opening a subject, the tile menu automatically be reset to the left side. I personally think this is incorrect. The menu should store the scroll position. Who is with me on this!
The Software Factory offers a solution in which you can configure unit tests for various functionalities/procedures. You are capable of comparing an expected output of your procedure with an actual output. This is a great way to verify whether changes within your current version might have broken this procedure/functionality.However several procedures use the GETDATE() option. This will lead to the fact that the actual output will never by equal to the expected output, since this was using a different date (and or time) stamp. I would like to be able to overrule the GETDATE() statement within my code into a preset date/time. When this is possible I will be able to compare the expected an actual output properly for these kind of procedures/functionalities.
The idea is to skip an editable field with Enter (or Tab) without it jumping to the next selectable piece like a field, icon or button (without making the next selectable piece read only. shown as below)
Currently all Process actions are available to the user and there's no indication during development that the created Process Flow is a valid System Flow. There's a validation that tells if there are Process actions used that are not available to be used in System Flows but it lacks helping the developer successfully set up a System Flow.With a checkbox in the main Process Flow screen, not only will it be easy to find System Flows in the long list of Process Flows, it can also be the indication for the SF to limit the amount of Process actions available for use. Also the Process schedule tab can then be hidden for Process Flows whilst available for System Flows.When changing an existing Process Flow to be a System Flow, there could be a check upon switching the checkbox if there are Process actions used that are not supported. When true, show a message.
Ability to have the Lookup icon on the other side, also (in Edit/Add mode) the dropdown icon to be on the other side with the Lookup icon
We need a way to highlight or change color of the 3 dots in the attached screenshot, so users will know that there are filters available but because of the screen size they are hidden.
A view is by default not editable so it would be nice if the SF automatically disables the add/delete/edit/mass update and import buttons when you create a view. Now it is often forgotten to disable the buttons what results in errors if the user uses them.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.