Propose your fantastic ideas regarding the Thinkwise Platform to our Product Team.
When a domain with datatype BIT and control checkbox is not mandatory, there are 3 options:empty (null) selected/active (0) deselected/inactive (1)When it is mandatory there are 2 options (0 & 1) but an asterisk is shown behind the options. For the user this looks like you have to select the active option. F.e. when you have to agree to an user policy it is obligated to check the checkbox. → We would like to have a mandatory checkbox without the asterisk so the user does not feel obligated to check the checkbox.
Idea to add conditional layout on a card list. Below I have a card list and a normal list with conditional layout. But the conditional layout is not visible on the card list.It would be great if this is possible! 😁
Would it be possible to have an extra Height Unit available called something like “Form Units” which is equal to the raster height in forms? This is the unwanted result when a fixed height in pixels is set, is shows extra whitespace then the height is to much or a vertical scrollbar when the height is set to low and it also depends on the client screen screen size and resolution. Especially on small handheld devices this is annoying.Ideally it should look like this
The backlog of the Universal GUI is really missing drag and drop from a cardlist. In a web-environment a card-list is quite often used (at least we do) and it is really a pity that apparently the drag-drop functionality will not be implemented for this component. I would really like to see drag-drop also from cardlist aside the grid and tree.
Hi,It would be greate to bring the arrange functionality back to the process flow designer screen!Currently, I'm really struggling to get a clear format, that's partly due to how the lines originate from the output side, especially when using a loop or multiple lines. As a result, it starts making strange turns on its own in the design screen.Maybe you are already working on that, in which case I haven't said anything haha.
SummaryAllow Thinkwise customers to share AI-enrichments they've created in their own Software Factory to a central, curated repository managed by Thinkwise — so that the entire customer community can discover, import, and benefit from enrichments written by others.The Problem TodayEach Thinkwise development-team develops AI-enrichments independently in their own Software Factory. There is no mechanism to share these enrichments with the broader Thinkwise community, which means:Customers reinvent the wheel building similar or identical enrichments. Valuable knowledge and innovation stays locked inside individual tenants. Smaller teams with fewer resources benefit less from AI capabilities compared to larger customers who invest more in development.The Proposed SolutionIntroduce a Shared AI-Enrichment Hub within the Software Factory, with the following flow:Create locally — A customer builds an AI-enrichment in their own Software Factory as they do today. Opt-in to share — The customer can choose to submit their enrichment to Thinkwise for inclusion in the central repository. Review & curate — Thinkwise reviews the submission for quality, safety, and relevance before publishing it. Distribute — Approved enrichments become available to all Thinkwise customers, who can browse, preview, and import them into their own Software Factory with one click.BenefitsFor customers sharing their enrichments:Recognition within the community as a contributor. Potential for Thinkwise to provide feedback and quality improvement. Contribution to an ecosystem they also benefit from.For customers consuming enrichments:Faster time-to-value — no need to build common enrichments from scratch. Access to high-quality, real-world enrichments built by experienced peers. Inspiration for building their own enrichments.For the Thinkwise ecosystem overall:Accelerates AI adoption across the entire customer base. Builds a vibrant, collaborative community around the platform. Thinkwise gains insight into how customers are using AI in practice, informing product direction.Possible Limitations & ConsiderationsGovernance & quality control Thinkwise would need a review process to ensure submitted enrichments meet quality, security, and privacy standards. Versioning and maintenance Enrichments may break or become outdated as Thinkwise evolves. A lifecycle policy is needed — who is responsible for maintaining a shared enrichment over time?Context dependency Many enrichments are highly tailored to a specific domain or data model. Generic enrichments will transfer well; niche ones may be less reusable and cause confusion if imported out of context.Discoverability As the repository grows, good tagging, categorization, and search functionality become critical. Without them, the repository risks becoming cluttered.Security & data privacy Customers must be sure that submitting an enrichment doesn't inadvertently expose proprietary data or business logic embedded in the enrichment's prompts or configuration.Suggested Scope for MVPA simple submission flow from the Software Factory to Thinkwise. A basic browsable gallery of approved enrichments, filterable by category or use case. One-click import into the customer's own Software Factory. Clear contributor attribution and a basic rating/feedback mechanism.
In Universal is is no longer possible for a user to create custom aggregations (column totals in the grid for instance), this was possible in the Windows GUI.
In Universal it is no longer possible to drag cube fields to change their order, this was possible in the Windows GUIThe workaround of adding a panel with cube fields is not user friendly, and take up valuable screen real estate
We are currently tightening user permissions within our IAM applications. Each company has its own IAM application with at least one key user. A key user supports IAM activities and is responsible for maintaining the role/permission structure for other users.We have reviewed the key-user responsibilities and adjusted permissions so they only have what they need. As part of this, we removed access that allowed changes to application-level settings. We no longer want to assign Main Administrator or Application Administrator roles to key users.Since these changes, key users can no longer access the “Effective user rights” table. This table is very useful for them because it provides a clear overview of what permissions users effectively have.Is there a way to grant access to the “Effective user rights” table by adding the required permissions to one of the following groups, without giving admin roles? Our key users currently have these roles:Application owners Group administrators User administrators Simulators
Auto-refresh is done based on the last refresh timestamp generated by the client, as the client and server can be out of sync for many reasons this leads so situations where the auto-refresh works incorrectly. This can lead to extra or missing refreshes.My suggestion is to include current server timestamp in the reply of the entity or auto-refresh procedure and use this as the input parameter to send with the next auto-refresh check.This way we are never in situation where we can have any desync of clocks.I am aware there are ways to avoid this issue but all are a workaround to essentially a solvable issue.
Is there a way of changing a Default Subject settings to be the same as one of its Variants?Transitioning to Universal we have made a Variant for most of our Subjects to give the Subject an updated look in Universal and leave the Windows Default unchanged.When we will stop using Windows, I would like if I can “make a Variant a Default”. It would be pretty tedious to manually change everything.
It is annoying that the filter pop-up is immediately closed when changing a prefilter that is part of an "OR" group.This problem mainly occurs on small devices, where filters must be set with a pop-up.I can imagine that it is difficult to come up with an intuitive solution for this. It might be an idea to add an 'Apply' button in those cases.
Could the favorites menu group always open as expanded please?An alternative could be that it remembers the last state.
Currently it’s only possible to add a theme to a “User” or a “User Group”.In our situation we have a theme for an application and platform.As we also have a lot of user groups it's quite a lot of work assigning the same theme to all user groups on all platforms (for our full DTAP we also have 4 IAM’s)So please make it possible to assign a theme on application level also add the possibility to differentiate on platform and set a default menu.Functionality can be placed as a detail tab under “General settings” at the application in IAM
A use case that happens ins many cases is where you have the grid with a detail tab with the form and other elements. For the user It's quite cumbersome to be going back and forth every time he wants to see the details of a couple of items in a row. I really miss the previous and next navigation buttons in the detail, where you can jump easily to the next or previous item in the context without the need to go back.
Based on the question I posted yesterday, I asked if its possible to have an optionfor a field to be responsive in height for Universal GUI. This can be used for fields that are meant for paragraphs of strings, like HTML and multilines since we only have in my knowledge to set fix height in SF->Subjects.Responsive field height for example will try to extend its height based on the remainingspace if there are available below it. This is very useful for applications that can be used for mobile view and web view Question:https://community.thinkwisesoftware.com/questions-conversations-78/is-it-possible-to-have-responsive-field-height-in-universal-gui-2785
During development, the "Refresh Model" task may be called hundreds of times per day.It might be an idea to move the task to the header bar or assign a Shortkey to the task.And at the same time ignore all warnings, because they do not matter during development. This will definitely save a lot of time during development.
Just like with tasks, I would like to create and use dummy reports. The reason for this is so the icons in the application are better ordered. Tasks are with other tasks and reports with other reports.Left Tasks - Right ReportsThe reason we need a dummy report is to start a process flow. The process flow then activates a task that will insert a row in a sort of Queue table. This queue table will limit the selection of rows that DevExpress will use to make it's report; thus making the process a lot faster.So this task need to be run before opening the report. But the task cannot be the starting point for the process flow and therefor we need to use a dummy report.
In edit mode you can add input constraints with regex that gives user feedback in the form. However, in the grid it only surrounds the field itself with a red line. It does not give any feedback to the user. It would be nice if the user knows what is wrong with the input value when editing in the grid.This field in the grid has an input constraint and only gets a red line
We are trying to make a complicated Calculation screen work properly and smoothly in the Universal GUI. One of the challenges is to have users click the right buttons, and the easiest way to support that is hiding buttons they shouldn't click. In below example we have 3 Refresh buttons, and we wish to hide 2 of them. A refresh on the higher level will also trigger the refresh of the detail tabs and using the Change Detection logic users don't have to trigger refreshes themselves. In the Software Factory we can specify this for every Action button, except for the Refresh button. Can this functionality please be added?This seems to me like a straightforward and logical addition to the Subjects > Performance tab (Buttons configurable in layout)Now we have to revert to a bit of custom CSS to hide this specific button.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.