Product updates
Ideas
Groups
E-learning
Documentation
Events

Community
Search

Replies posted by Marcel van Langen

17 Replies

Newest first

Oldest first

Marcel van LangenSidekick

Possibility to add custom fields to a work itemOpen

@Jasper thank you for your answer. I looked into it, but it seems that the tags are linked to individual work items. That would mean that every work item would need be completed with a number of the same tags. Aside from the risk of typos etc., that would be a very inefficient way to be able to add fields. It would also be limited in solution. For instance, it would work when you talk about a simple boolean field (like DPIA yes or no), but it would not work efficiently if you - for instance - wanted to link an origin (i.e. which of the customers asked for this solution) to the work item. In that case a dropdown with a limited set of possibilities would be more appropriate. Hope this answer helps!

Marcel van LangenSidekick

asked in Questions & Conversations

Can I use SQL code to enter default in the Software Factory?

Ah, I understand. For us, I see no need for using defaults to be filled with (scalar) UDF's. Looking back, I can't think of a time when we've used that (when filling a default), although I know you can in SQL Server. In terms of performance (when using it as a parameter to query the database) there is also good reason not to use this, so that is probably a good reason not to be to hasty to build this into the TSF. Thinking about it, that's probably a good reason for us to not use UDF's for defaults, even when it would have been possible in TSF.

Marcel van LangenSidekick

asked in Questions & Conversations

Can I use SQL code to enter default in the Software Factory?

@Frank Wijnhout Yes most definitely. The default gets set on the insert when there is not a specific value given. So for instance on a column 'date_record_added’ it would serve a purpose. I'm not sure why you'd think I want to use it differently in my example?

Marcel van LangenSidekick

asked in Questions & Conversations

Unsure how to write specific unit test

Today Serhat looked at it. The fact that it didn't work was because I used a field for unit testing (postal_code) that I didn't use in the application. In the application I used the field 'initials’. So the lesson here: only unit test a dynamic default on columns that you also use in the application. Thanks Serhat for the help!

Harm HorstmanSuperhero

asked in Questions & Conversations

How to schedule a process flow?

Just to be sure: this means that when you want to run a task on a regular basis, the only option is to use the connector? Or is there another way to run scheduled tasks? I'm also trying to get this to work.

Marcel van LangenSidekick

asked in Questions & Conversations

Can I use SQL code to enter default in the Software Factory?

Thanks for the reply. Good to see others like this feature as well.

Marcel van LangenSidekick

asked in Questions & Conversations

Unsure how to write specific unit test

Serhat and I will look into it together. After that, I'll post our findings below this story for others.

Marcel van LangenSidekick

asked in Questions & Conversations

Unsure how to write specific unit test

Thanks for your reply. It is difficult to see what I'm looking for. Every time I run the unit test I get a couple of processes (but they all sort of look the same). The following seems to be the essential of it: declare @default_mode tinyint; declare @import_mode tinyint; declare @cursor_from_col_id varchar(255) = ''achternaam''; declare @cursor_to_col_id varchar(255); declare @zba_portaal_berichten_overig_client_id int; declare @zba_portaal_berichten_overig_bericht_id int; declare @bsn varchar(9); declare @geboortedatum date; declare @geslacht tinyint; declare @achternaam varchar(200) = ''van Langen''; declare @voorvoegsel varchar(10); declare @voorletters varchar(6); declare @commentaar varchar(8000); execute def_zba_portaal_berichten_overig_client @default_mode = @default_mode, @import_mode = @import_mode, @cursor_from_col_id = @cursor_from_col_id, @cursor_to_col_id = @cursor_to_col_id output,

Marcel van LangenSidekick

asked in Questions & Conversations

Unsure how to write specific unit test

Just to be sure, I have added screenshots FYI. Hope this helps!

Marcel van LangenSidekick

asked in Questions & Conversations

Unsure how to write specific unit test

Hello Serhat, I let it simmer for the weekend and decided to have a look at it again this morning. But no matter how I look at it, I can't seem to find anything wrong with it. So I'm hoping you can have a more in depth look at it. I think all the info is in the story, but if you need anything else, please let me know! Many thanks in advance! BTW: I've obviously checked that the default is working in the application

Marcel van LangenSidekick

asked in Questions & Conversations

In Universal RC 2.1.0 versions are showing that are inactive

Thank you for the reply (and the suggested workaround). We can work around this, not a problem.

Marcel van LangenSidekick

asked in Questions & Conversations

In Universal 2.1.0 tasks from the menu are not started

OK, we'll investigate this further together with Michael and Raj from Thinkwise.

Marcel van LangenSidekick

asked in Questions & Conversations

In Universal 2.1.0 tasks from the menu are not started

What I get: vendors~main.0ac36871.chunk.js:2 POST https://webservice.xxxx.nl/ont_sf_indicium/sf/204/zba_bericht_toevoegen/stage 400 I've replaced a part of the URL with xxxx. Hope this helps! Marcel

Marcel van LangenSidekick

Possibility to unassign a work itemClosed

Hai Mark, Haha, I'm sorry, I didn't get that. It was so easy. I thought that since it was a dropdown (and there was no option in the dropdown to deselect) that you could not unassign the item. The solution was so close… Thank you for your answer. Marcel

Marcel van LangenSidekick

Possibility to add relationship between work itemsCompleted

Thanks for your reply! The function would be primarely informational indeed It would show the relationship between work. It helps the authors of work and the planners. Your suggestion would absolutely be workable. Thinking along these lines, I would like it if you could then click on the linked work item to open it directly. It would be nice if extra attention could be given to the blocked relationships: you wouldn't want to add a work item to an iteration when the work item that is blocking it, is not done yet or in the same iteration.

Marcel van LangenSidekick

Possibility to add relationship between work itemsCompleted

Just to add to the story: the possible relationships are more or less copied from the relationships that are possible in JIRA. Obviously the relationships works both ways. So you can have a relationship 'work 1 blocks work 2’ when you're looking at work 1. When looking at work 2 you would see 'work 2 is blocked by work 1’. The same goes for all types of relationships.

Marcel van LangenSidekick

asked in Questions & Conversations

How to make an add form directly active

Thank you Mark for your quick reply. Sounds like a plan! I'll try and add this to our application tomorrow. I'll let you know if there are any issues.

Badges

Martijn_Reedehas earned the badge Geek
Dennis Kallanseehas earned the badge Geek
Alban_Thas earned the badge Generator
martijngaasbeekhas earned the badge Preparator
SanderAdamhas earned the badge Preparator

Show all badges

Powered by Gainsight

Terms & Conditions Cookie settings

Sign up

Already have an account? Login

Login

Login to the Thinkwise Software Community

Login

Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.

Username or e-mail

Back to overview

Scanning file for viruses.

Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.

OK

This file cannot be downloaded

Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.

OK