It turns out that when you add a user to the ‘get users’, you have to reboot the service. Now this person is being picked up. However, we do see that a synch is often started for this user. What is the reason for this? Is this only initial because it is a new user?
Okay, you can call the procedure and then it will also be reset. Thank you.
A few people told me that they had voted. Somehow the votes seem to have been reset, or something like that.
All, If I'm correct, the requested solution should be available in the latest SF Suite (2018.3). If not, it should be in the 2019.1 release.
Hello Sharp, The set of prefilters which are displayed within a subject variant, should be added on the base configuration of this subject. If you would like to hide a specific prefilter in your 'standard' subject, you should also create a variant which you will use as the standard display of you subject. It is also possible to hide a prefilter on the standard display and enable this prefilter within a variant. However this will lead to unwanted issues, regarding the availability of this prefilter within this variant and therefor is not advised.
Hi Roland, It isn't possible to disable the validation check before synchronizing your model. However within the menu item Global setting (Within the IAM application) you can set the minimum required validation severity. By altering this setting you can prevent the validation error to popup whilst not all information and warning validation checks have been solved.
Hi Roland, Good to hear you've already posted an issue regarding the error being displayed during the validation procedure. It shouldn't be necessary to create a topic regarding this issue on community. If you'd like an update regarding this issue, you could try to post a feedback message, in which you can ask for an update regarding the status of the issue. Regarding the validation error 'Manually created validations have to be edited', are those validations created by a colleague or yourself?
Hi Raj, It is not possible to print files directly using a WebGUI interface. It is only possible to download the documents as a .PDF file. This leaves you with 2 options: [list=1] [*]Multi select the documents you would like to print. The WebGUI will create a .ZIP file containing all .PDF files for each specific document [*]Alter you initial report (used to create the document) and make it support the values of multiple rows within just 1 document. That way you can combine the selected documents into just one document and one .PDF file. Therefor allowing you to print your selected documents all at once. [/list]
Hello Wiebe, It is possible to copy a specific project version from one database to another. However both Software Factory databases have to be the exact same version of the Thinkwise SF Suite. If both databases are compatible with each other, you can copy the code used in the procedure task_copy_project_vrs into a custom code. This code will copy a project version into another project version. This code is similar to the code required to export a specific project and import this project into another database. There is only one adjustment required to enable you to copy the project into another database, you need to change the insert into (insert into new_sf_database..[table]) You can use a find and replace option to do so (replace 'insert into ', 'insert into new_sf_database..'). Notice, you will first need to create the project (target) to which you would like to copy this specific project version (source). Otherwise the copy will fail, since it only copies a project version and doesn
I most definitely support this idea. I usually solve this by using a hidden column, which contains the filter value of the parent node. However creating a more general feature which supports this, is a way better idea.
Hello Harm, This columns are required for views which are not created by using a control procedure template: [img]https://uploads-eu-west-1.insided.com/thinkwise-en/attachment/99f99388-efbd-4b08-b33a-5e1bf84cb3c8.png[/img] The 'View table' column represents the from clause used in these type of views. The 'View column' column represents the column used in the source table.
Harm, Indeed this should be the case. You can report an issue in our portal (TCP) containing this case.
Hi Anne, Unfortunately hiding the task(s) within a variant is not the solutions I'm looking for, as these tasks should indeed be accessible through the ribbon and context menu. [quote=Anne Buit]I assume you'd want some way to mark some tasks to never show up in a task bar? This would return them to the general action bar.[/quote] That is correct. I would like the option of hiding certain tasks from the task bar, and therefor only displaying these tasks within the general action bar. In several screens the application has over 10 tasks available, where only 5 of these are used often. The other 5 tasks do not have to be visual in the shortlists of tasks.
Leroy, I'm try to find a screen which contains the HTML component, I'm having a hard time finding one. In which screen can I test this new component?
I totally support this idea. Most of the Prefilters I set up based on a Query are required due to lack of the support of an OR function.
Jasper, Thank you. This should lead to an easy transition.
Erwin, I totally agree with you. I have submitted this wish a long time ago (internally). Based on the fact that "contains" is a possible performance risk and "equal to" should result in a much better performance.
Anne, Could you give a link to a file download for Service Pack 21 of Crystal Reports? Thank you in advance.
[user=87]Tom van Druten[/user] , In most cases, including this one, the acceptation and production environment use there own application folder. Therefor setting this folder in the SF project version, is not going to solve my problem.
I have run into simular problems. After deploying a specific project version, rights sometimes have to be altered. This is due to the fact that end users can not test their rights before deploying a version onto IAM. Therefor I’am required to alter the rights after deploying this version. After altering the rights, I have to redeploy the entire version, which seems a little overkill, especially when your project is quite large. I do see the issue: when you've add objects to the model which cannot be mapped in IAM. This will lead to a model conflict. All I’am asking for is a solution for this, which ever works bests. Thanks in advance.
I support his idea, if this change does not have a significant negative influence on the performance of cubes with a large amount data.
Erwin, In general the upgrade should be successful when all the validations regarding the upgrade process have been properly solved. Users with allot of experience could also manually execute the upgrade step using the management studio. The upgrade script has been supplied with a header, that marks the section which drops the (old) tables. You could firstly execute the section above this header and later on choose to execute the section below the header.
Tim, Will this new tree feature support a better filter option then our current tree does? At this moment filtering within a tree will only display a row matching the filtered value, instead of display the parents of the filtered value and the filtered value.
Mark, I'd guess that you probably would like the same feature for prefilters columns? Otherwise there would be a deviation between conditional layout and prefilters.
Hi Hugo, What is the full URL you are using to connect to your application? It is required to link to an IAM application. For example https://mywebsite.com/indicium/api/iam.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.
We use 3 different kinds of cookies. You can choose which cookies you want to accept. We need basic cookies to make this site work, therefore these are the minimum you can select. Learn more about our cookies.
