I noticed that, when making a conditional layout, if I specify the condition like this:
the relevant columns in the table look like this, where I’d expect a conditional layout to be applied.
However, by simply interchanging the columns in the condition
I do get a working conditional layout:
What’s going on here? I’d expect the order of the columns in the Condition to not matter. Is this intended, or would you like me to report this as a bug?
Best answer by Mark Jongeling
Hi Dries,
Sounds a bit like either an oversight. The first screenshot is the correct behavior. The second one is not.
If you want this to work correctly, then you'll need two conditional layouts; one which looks to see if the Year end old is filled or not - if not Year end is Red, and two to compare both but with the added condition that Year end old is not null.
Feel free to report this in TCP 
+23Hi Dries,
Sounds a bit like either an oversight. The first screenshot is the correct behavior. The second one is not.
If you want this to work correctly, then you'll need two conditional layouts; one which looks to see if the Year end old is filled or not - if not Year end is Red, and two to compare both but with the added condition that Year end old is not null.
Feel free to report this in TCP
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
