Skip to main content

There is an option to add custom code to the Upgrade code group to do for example an insert into a table. However, how do I use this when using a branch? 

for example if I have a table with 2 rows and during development I want to add row number 3. 

 

trunk version 1        2 rows exist

   branch version 1  2 rows exist

   branch version 2  3 rows should exist    

trunk version 2        3 rows should exist

 

Branch version 2 is merged back to the trunk to create trunk v2 and trunk version 2 will be used to do the upgrade from trunk version 1 to 2. 

The actual insert is developed in branch version 2. Now I have two options: 

option 1: If I use after upgrade always then the code is in the upgrade script every release untill i delete it  manually. 

option 2 :If I use after upgrade from branch 1 to branch 2 then insert part gets lost in the trunk version 2. 

 

How do I do this correctly? If I have to do it manually in trunk version 2 then it beats the purpose of the upgrade script part. 

 

Hi Erwin,

Currently, there is no elegant way to deal with this. The assumption that the upgrade between branch 1 and branch 2 is the same as the upgrade between trunk 1 and trunk 2 cannot always be made.

Furthermore, if there are 3 versions in the branch and the template is only present in branch version 2 to facilitate the upgrade between branch 1 and branch 2, it cannot be applied between trunk 1 and trunk 2 because it won’t be present in trunk 2.

In this specific case with 2 versions, using the after_upgrade_branch_1_branch_2 would be the best solution because a validation in the trunk will notify you that the template is no longer assigned in the trunk, so it can be identified and re-assigned quickly.

Technically, a dynamic model procedure can also be added that creates or updates the custom code assignments in the trunk automatically based on information of a recently merged brach.

On the backlog there is a change request (6862) for the squash task to include the custom upgrade code.


HI Anne,

Thanks for your reply. Good to hear that there is something on the backlog for this. 

Erwin


Reply