Blog

Sending smooth progress

  • 27 December 2023
  • 3 replies
  • 149 views
Sending smooth progress
Userlevel 7
Badge +23

Hi everyone!

Applications built with the Thinkwise platform are usually quite large. Whether that means the application has a lot of screens, tables, users, or anything else, there typically are processes in the application that take a while. To inform users of the progress, you can use the procedure tsf_send_progress

Challenge

The tricky part when having 10, 20, or even more statements inside the process, is to determine how far the process is in its execution. You would rather not manually place the send progress function before or after every statement and assign a progress value. When new statements are added, or removed, all the progress should be recalculated. However, you do want to inform the user and keep the user up-to-date. How to solve this?

This exact scenario occurred in the Software Factory application development. The export model task in the Software Factory is a lengthy process that involves all tables that are part of the model; 295 to be exact at the time of writing. 

Solution

To inform users about the progression of a given process, we have introduced a table-valued function called calculate_progress that you can use to assign the progress parameter of the tsf_send_progress procedure dynamically. Let's dive in:

The calculate_progress function takes four input parameters, namely:

Parameter Datatype Description
start_percentage numeric(3,0) The starting percentage of the function, e.g. 0
end_percentage numeric(3,0) The ending percentage of the function, e.g. 100
current_count int The row number of the row in the recordset
max_count int The total amount of rows that will be processed

This function is intended to be used with SQL-typed control procedures and the Staged strategy.

With the challenge mentioned earlier, let's look at how the Export model task gives developers smooth progress. The task includes the following template:

-- Send progress
exec tsf_send_progress 'export_branch_progress_tab_id', '<tab tabid="[TAB]"/>', [PROGRESS]

-- Export [TAB]
insert into @data (data_tab_name, json_data)
select '[TAB]',
(select
[COL] as [COL_NAME][COMMA]
from [TAB] t1
where t1.model_id = @model_id
and t1.branch_id = @branch_id
for json path)

In this template, [TAB] is replaced by the table name, [COL] by its columns, [COL_NAME] by the designated alias, and [COMMA] by a comma if it isn’t the last column. The data is transformed into a JSON and captured in a declared temporary table for later use, which is irrelevant to this blog.

The tsf_send_progress function has three input parameters: the message as defined in the model, the translation of the given table name, and the progress value that we will dynamically assign.

Looking at the control procedure code, the program object item assignments are done like this:

insert into #prog_object_item
(
prog_object_id,
prog_object_item_id,
order_no,
template_id
)
select
'task_export_model', -- Task name
'export_' + t.tab_id, -- Unique program object item
100 + row_number() over(order by t.tab_id), -- Order no
'export_tab_id' -- Template name
from @tabs t -- Collection of tables that need to be exported

This will weave the template export_tab_id for every table included in the @tabs declared table; so all tables that should be exported. The order number is calculated based on alphabetical order.

Now we added another statement that replaces of the [PROGRESS] parameter inside the template:

-- Replace [PROGRESS] with the corresponding progress value items created in this control procedure
declare @total int = (select count(*) from @tabs)

insert into #prog_object_item_parmtr
(
prog_object_id,
prog_object_item_id,
parmtr_id,
parmtr_value,
order_no,
no_line_when_empty
)
select
p.prog_object_id,
p.prog_object_item_id,
'PROGRESS',
dbo.calculate_progress(1, 98, row_number() over(order by p.order_no), @total),
1000 + (p.order_no * 10),
0
from #prog_object_item p
where p.prog_object_id = 'task_export_model' -- Task name
and p.prog_object_item_id like 'export[_]%' -- The desired prefix we used earlier

This will replace the [PROGRESS] parameter inside our code with the calculated progress value. The returned progress value will be between 1 and 98, and is calculated per row in the #prog_object_item temporary table. Row 1 has progress 1, Row 148 has progress 49 and Row 295 has progress 98.

After generating the control procedure, the result will look like this:

Partial result of generating the control procedure

 

Summary

Sending smooth progress updates doesn't have to be a coding conundrum. Using calculate_progress, you can easily determine the progress per record and have the flexibility to start and end the progress at any point. Simply indicate at what number to start, at what number to end, adding a row number, and lastly, give the total amount to records. Your users will be kept in the loop and see a smooth progression. For what process will you introduce this?


3 replies

Userlevel 5
Badge +5

Side-note: the Universal GUI supports `tsf_send_message` progress reporting from version 2023.3.13 and up on task execution.

Userlevel 6
Badge +10

@Mark Jongeling Great blog, good to know about a quick and easy way to standardize this!

One thing that’s not very clear to me from the docs and this blog though: what is the expected standard behavior for the Universal GUI?

In Universal GUI 2023.3.13 we don’t see any difference between ‘Await result’ value Yes versus Yes (no progress indicator). Both show a spinner after Execute. 

Userlevel 5
Badge +5

In Universal GUI 2023.3.13 we don’t see any difference between ‘Await result’ value Yes versus Yes (no progress indicator). Both show a spinner after Execute. 

 

Like before 2023.3.13 the modal popup with the spinner on it is the default behaviour. The spinner stays until a progress message comes in via the Websocket or until the task is finished.

There is indeed no real difference between those 2 options atm. Our Windows client shows a loading cursor or a popup with a spinner based on those 2 options.

Reply