I don't seem to be able to expand more than 1 level. Is this correct and is there a way to go and extra level. Like I'm selecting via oData invoice, then expand into invoice_line and in the line I want to translate tag_id to get the name.
Question
Support for nested expands/translations
+16
Hello
No, this is not correct, this is actually supported. Does my answer here provide enough insight?
+16Hello
No, this is not correct, this is actually supported. Does my answer here provide enough insight?
Can you give me an example of a odata call? I wasn’t able to get it to work. Let me try first by replacing transl- with lookup_.. to be able to get 2 levels. I’ll let you know
+5- Hero
Hi Freddy,
Were you able to make some progress on this topic?
If the answer of Vincent helped you, could you mark it as best answer?
Best regards,
Nick Janssen
+16Hello
No, this is not correct, this is actually supported. Does my answer here provide enough insight?
I don't the nested level to show anything.. I cannot follow
sf/43/charge(e15a01cc-e8dd-4350-934b-a256fffb4f9b)?$select=charge_id&$expand=detail_ref_charge_charge_line($select=charge_line,payment_id;$expand=lookup_payment_id),lookup_charge_counterpart($select=entity_type,address_id;$expand=lookup_address_id)
gives the following. Both address_id as payment_id have a lookup defined in the SF. Inside the lookup_charge_counterpart.. it's not even showing the lookup_address_id .. and the lookup_payment_id (or transl_payment_id) shows but stays empty.. whilst there is an id.
{
"charge_id": "e15a01cc-e8dd-4350-934b-a256fffb4f9b",
"lookup_charge_counterpart": {
"entity_type": 2,
"address_id": 36
},
"detail_ref_charge_charge_line": [
{
"charge_line": 1,
"payment_id": 11638,
"lookup_payment_id": {}
}
]
}
+16Hello
No, this is not correct, this is actually supported. Does my answer here provide enough insight?
I don't the nested level to show anything.. I cannot follow
sf/43/charge(e15a01cc-e8dd-4350-934b-a256fffb4f9b)?$select=charge_id&$expand=detail_ref_charge_charge_line($select=charge_line,payment_id;$expand=lookup_payment_id),lookup_charge_counterpart($select=entity_type,address_id;$expand=lookup_address_id)
gives the following. Both address_id as payment_id have a lookup defined in the SF. Inside the lookup_charge_counterpart.. it's not even showing the lookup_address_id .. and the lookup_payment_id (or transl_payment_id) shows but stays empty.. whilst there is an id.
{
"charge_id": "e15a01cc-e8dd-4350-934b-a256fffb4f9b",
"lookup_charge_counterpart": {
"entity_type": 2,
"address_id": 36
},
"detail_ref_charge_charge_line": [
{
"charge_line": 1,
"payment_id": 11638,
"lookup_payment_id": {}
}
]
}
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.