I don't seem to be able to expand more than 1 level. Is this correct and is there a way to go and extra level. Like I'm selecting via oData invoice, then expand into invoice_line and in the line I want to translate tag_id to get the name.
Question
Support for nested expands/translations
+16
Hello
No, this is not correct, this is actually supported. Does my answer here provide enough insight?
+16Hello
No, this is not correct, this is actually supported. Does my answer here provide enough insight?
Can you give me an example of a odata call? I wasn’t able to get it to work. Let me try first by replacing transl- with lookup_.. to be able to get 2 levels. I’ll let you know
+5Hi Freddy,
Were you able to make some progress on this topic?
If the answer of Vincent helped you, could you mark it as best answer?
Best regards,
Nick Janssen
+16Hello
No, this is not correct, this is actually supported. Does my answer here provide enough insight?
I don't the nested level to show anything.. I cannot follow
sf/43/charge(e15a01cc-e8dd-4350-934b-a256fffb4f9b)?$select=charge_id&$expand=detail_ref_charge_charge_line($select=charge_line,payment_id;$expand=lookup_payment_id),lookup_charge_counterpart($select=entity_type,address_id;$expand=lookup_address_id)
gives the following. Both address_id as payment_id have a lookup defined in the SF. Inside the lookup_charge_counterpart.. it's not even showing the lookup_address_id .. and the lookup_payment_id (or transl_payment_id) shows but stays empty.. whilst there is an id.
{
"charge_id": "e15a01cc-e8dd-4350-934b-a256fffb4f9b",
"lookup_charge_counterpart": {
"entity_type": 2,
"address_id": 36
},
"detail_ref_charge_charge_line": [
{
"charge_line": 1,
"payment_id": 11638,
"lookup_payment_id": {}
}
]
}
+16Hello
No, this is not correct, this is actually supported. Does my answer here provide enough insight?
I don't the nested level to show anything.. I cannot follow
sf/43/charge(e15a01cc-e8dd-4350-934b-a256fffb4f9b)?$select=charge_id&$expand=detail_ref_charge_charge_line($select=charge_line,payment_id;$expand=lookup_payment_id),lookup_charge_counterpart($select=entity_type,address_id;$expand=lookup_address_id)
gives the following. Both address_id as payment_id have a lookup defined in the SF. Inside the lookup_charge_counterpart.. it's not even showing the lookup_address_id .. and the lookup_payment_id (or transl_payment_id) shows but stays empty.. whilst there is an id.
{
"charge_id": "e15a01cc-e8dd-4350-934b-a256fffb4f9b",
"lookup_charge_counterpart": {
"entity_type": 2,
"address_id": 36
},
"detail_ref_charge_charge_line": [
{
"charge_line": 1,
"payment_id": 11638,
"lookup_payment_id": {}
}
]
}
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.