Hi Anne, I appreciate your tips. I am not a specialist on tenants. That is a specific deployment and installation department at Acto. I am almost sure there are many dependendies. Even when it would be possible. Than we only solved a small part of my wish. I will look in to it. The most flexibel solution for us as a ISV in a form is simular functionality as in a list. It gives us, the customer and the end-user maximum flexibility. It should be possible in the model to give this extra functionality in the user preferences and in IAM.
Hey Roel, Our situation is that we have one application. I don't know de reasons for that?
Hello Roel, Thanx for your reply. A beautifull functionality. This solution is a small step in what i like to achieve. The most important thing is flexibility for the end-user. Secondly flexibility for the end-customer. 90% of our end-customers will work from a multi tenant environment. Your sugestion does not work in a mult tenant.
Hello Bart, We work as a ISV. Our consultants implement and configure the standard application specific for that customer. Without using the SF. The consultants implement the same software at 100+ different customers. The suggestion that the customer asks to reinstate a specific field is in a ISV situation never asked at the developer. But will be asked at the application manager of that customer or at the consultant. When we should implement my wish. It should also be possible to configure the autorisation of the fields in the forms in IAM. Because sometimes the costomar will decide with the consultant that some fields in the forms can be removed.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.